[krbdev.mit.edu #1525] API (inadvertant?) change

Sam Hartman via RT rt-comment at krbdev.mit.edu
Sun May 25 23:53:09 EDT 2003



I think that stashing the pointers in krb5_get_in_tkt_with_* is the
right solution.

Avoiding the memset may break some applications that pass in garbage a
 credential, as might avoiding memsetting the client and server.

Rolling back the change to krb5_get_in_tkt would require that we
handle the AES issue some other way.



More information about the krb5-bugs mailing list