[krbdev.mit.edu #1353] Decide on a long-term krb524 strategy

Sam Hartman via RT rt-comment at krbdev.mit.edu
Fri Feb 14 22:32:53 EST 2003




Do we want to move this into libkrb5?  One disadvantage would be that
our ABI would be different when built --without-krb4 than when boult
--with-krb4.


If not, do we want to install a header and make it a shared library?


Also, we need to deal in some manner with the fact that the error
table initializer is needed on Unix but not exported on KFM.



More information about the krb5-bugs mailing list