Proposal for the assignment of fixed ordinals to exported functions in kfw dlls

[Jeffrey Altman]

Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think your proposal was reasonable and thanks for implementing it.
>
> I wonder if we want to look at assignment policies going forward so
> that if someone does choose to fork they can at least get a unique
> ordinal.
>
> --Sam
I've been thinking about this as well.

I think that we should reserve the first couple of thousand ordinal
values for MIT and document it in the .DEF file going forward.

Jeffrey Altman


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kfwdev/attachments/20071015/b41b38e5/attachment.bin