Proposal for the assignment of fixed ordinals to exported functionsin kfw dlls

[Jeffrey Altman]

Ken Raeburn wrote:
> If I understand correctly, this won't prevent us from somewhere down
> the line removing the private symbols that applications aren't
> supposed to be using, but we export for the moment for the current
> GSSAPI or Kerberos v4 implementations, right?
>
> Ken
Not at all.  In fact, we could mark the private symbols as NONAME and
make them only accessible via the ordinal if we really wanted to make
them private.

Of course, that would break third party apps that currently rely on
their presence.

Jeffrey Altman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kfwdev/attachments/20071007/65e75b52/attachment.bin