Determening the number of clients per KDC
Sergei Gerasenko
gerases at gmail.com
Tue Apr 17 09:32:39 EDT 2018
Thank you so much for confirming that the KDCs are fast. This saved me a ton of time writing my own tests, etc. Andrew, as far as workers, is it one worker per core in general as Russ theorized?
Otherwise, I think I’m all set for now.
Thanks!!
> On Apr 16, 2018, at 8:41 PM, Russ Allbery <eagle at eyrie.org> wrote:
>
> Andrew Cobaugh <andrew.cobaugh at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Also currently using it to demonstrate how much faster MIT Kerberos is
>> compared to AD, even when not using workers (on modern-ish CPUs, without
>> workers enabled krb5kdc can do ~4000 rps. I can share more details if
>> folks are interested).
>
> Ah, good, I'm glad my 100 qps number was off in the direction that I
> thought it would be. I didn't want to overpromise, but KDCs are *really
> fast*.
>
> --
> Russ Allbery (eagle at eyrie.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
> ________________________________________________
> Kerberos mailing list Kerberos at mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
More information about the Kerberos
mailing list