#defines for version available?

[Chris Hecker]

I think, from a programming standpoint, I want the core krb5 version 
that's in patchlevel.h.  That's the thing that changes with the API and 
features and whatnot (ignoring any platform patches, which I guess is 
not really a safe thing to ignore, given that I just spent 10 hours 
wading through the rpm patches for RHEL and getting things building and 
installed from latest source, but anyway).

Chris



On 2011/07/26 05:33, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:28 -0400, Chris Hecker wrote:
>> Hmm, on windows it just returns "Kerberos for Windows", while on linux
>> it returns "Kerberos 5 version 1.9.1".
>
> Yeah, on Windows we use a different and overlapping build system, and
> it's not smart enough to put the version number there.  Also,
> historically our Windows releases have used a different version
> numbering scheme (the last one was Kerberos for Windows 3.2.2, based on
> krb5 1.6), so it's not even clear which version to put there.
>
>
>