RFC: Turning off reverse hostname resolution by default in 1.10

Simo Sorce simo at redhat.com
Wed Jul 6 14:22:50 EDT 2011


On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:01 -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 13:41 -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >> >Does anyone on this list intentionally rely on PTR lookups for
> >> >Kerberos hostname canonicalization?
> >> 
> >> "Yes".
> >> 
> >> (I can go into detail if you really care).
> >
> >I am interested if you can explain.
> 
> The answers:
> 
> - Multihomed hosts (we want to connect to a particular interface, but
>   we want to use one canonical name, because adding a new keytab for a
>   new interface is more of a pain than simply changing the reverse DNS).
>   This also comes into issue when you're doing cross-domain multihoming
>   where the host is in another domain (and other Kerberos realm), and
>   yes, we do that too (but thankfully not that often).
> - Hostname masquerading, where the host has a CNAME pointing to the
>   "real" name, but for various reasons we want the name used by Kerberos
>   to be the CNAME.
> 
> I admit that these issues are not insurmountable.  But I am just answering
> the question that Greg asked.

I would resolve all these issues by using aliases at the KDC level, but
thank you for explaining, it's valuable data on the way KDC/DNS are used
to keep track off.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York




More information about the Kerberos mailing list