@ in principal names

[Greg Hudson]

On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 09:11 -0500, Peter Mogensen wrote:
> Am I correct when I conclude the "name types" (RFC4120 section 6.2) is 
> not widely supported either?

That's essentially correct.  There's no string form representation of
different name types, so the name type of a principal tends to be
limited to a few values (NT-UNKNOWN, NT-SRV-INST, or NT-SRV-HST)
depending on application context.