krb5_sendauth vs NAGLE vs DelayedAck

[Nicolas Williams]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:52:34PM -0500, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 15:22, John Hascall wrote:
> > My solution was just to do:
> >  int on = 1;
> >  setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &on, sizeof(on));
> > before calling krb5_sendauth() but a "better" approach might
> > be for krb5_write_message to end up calling writev so it
> > does one write instead of two, I think.
> 
> Yes, I think that's probably best -- maybe via a helper function to  
> run a loop and manage the bookkeeping in case of short writes.

Or setsockopt() TCP_CORK around krb5_sendauth().