Principal attributes and policy in LDAP Realm

[Simo Sorce]

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 10:05 -0400, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2008, at 09:03, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Is there a specific reason why the database layer has not been
> > abstracted appropriately ? Any chance we can work to fix these  
> > problems
> > and come up with a better schema ?
> 
> Mostly lack of resources/priority/motivation/etc I guess; certainly no  
> reason why we don't want it done.  But it's an issue that's been  
> getting more discussion lately in some of our internal meetings.
> 
> Have you followed the KDC information model and schema discussions  
> happening related to the IETF Kerberos working group?  The discussions  
> were taking place on a couple of external mailing lists, not the main  
> working group mailing list:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kdc-info
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kdc-schema
> They're pretty quiet now, but you can check through the archives.

Ken, thanks for the pointers, I am starting looking into the archives,
but it seem that both are up to August 2006 and there is nothing else
afterward. Did communication stop right there? Or is there some other
place with the recent archives ?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York