pam-krb5 3.5 released

[Markus Moeller]

SEAM is fine as long as you don't write your own applications which nearly 
always need a couple of plain Kerberos function calls aside of gssapi calls.

Markus

<Rainer.Heilke at atcoitek.com> wrote in message 
news:AD1D482E7127AF4AB30E2B3763F1E4A608331E5B at is051.atco.com...
> What headers are you looking for specifically? Sun calls their
> implementation of Kerberos "SEAM." We've been using it quite
> successfully (aside from having to compile our own ksu binary from the
> MIT source).
>
> Rainer
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kerberos-bounces at mit.edu
>> [mailto:kerberos-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Markus Moeller
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:24 PM
>> To: kerberos at mit.edu
>> Subject: Re: pam-krb5 3.5 released
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have now Solaris 10 Update 4 installed  but still don't see
>> Kerberos
>> header files. It seems I need to wait for Solaris 12 ;-)
>>
>> Markus
>>
>> <Rainer.Heilke at atcoitek.com> wrote in message
>> news:AD1D482E7127AF4AB30E2B3763F1E4A608331770 at is051.atco.com...
>> >A lurker uncloaking...
>> >
>> >> The 6 months are almost up, start looking for the Solaris 10
>> >> release...
>> >
>> > The news we are getting is that Update 4 should be coming
>> out in early
>> > August. From what I've been seeing and hearing, it was
>> pushed back twice
>> > (June to July, then August).
>> >
>> >> > BTW Isn't OpenSolaris = Solaris 11 ? At least configure said:
>> >> > checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.11
>> >> > checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.11
>> >
>> > Well, yes and no. A lot of the work in OpenSolaris is getting rolled
>> > into the Sol10 Update releases. A few other comments I've
>> heard make it
>> > seem like calling it "Solaris 11" was merely a useful fiction to
>> > separate it from the fully-supported, commercial releases.
>> When Solaris
>> > 10 ends, what marketing calls the new version is anybody's guess
>> > (Solaris 11 being a good bet). Between this, and the name
>> "Nevada", etc.
>> > there's a lot of confusion, and if someone has a straight-forward,
>> > official clarification of all the names, I've missed it or
>> forgotten it.
>> >
>> > IHTH
>> >
>> > Rainer
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The information transmitted is intended only for the
>> addressee and may
>> > contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material. Any
>> > unauthorized review, distribution or other use of or the
>> taking of any
>> > action in reliance upon this information is prohibited. If
>> you receive
>> > this in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy this
>> > message and any copies.
>> >
>> > ________________________________________________
>> > Kerberos mailing list           Kerberos at mit.edu
>> > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________
>> Kerberos mailing list           Kerberos at mit.edu
>> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
>>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the addressee and may 
> contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material. Any 
> unauthorized review, distribution or other use of or the taking of any 
> action in reliance upon this information is prohibited. If you receive 
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy this 
> message and any copies.
>
> ________________________________________________
> Kerberos mailing list           Kerberos at mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
>