krb524d and KRB524_KRB4_DISABLED
Jeffrey Altman
jaltman at secure-endpoints.com
Wed Oct 17 00:10:38 EDT 2007
John Hascall wrote:
> As a part of our seemingly endless path to
> eliminating KRB4 I was thinking I'd like
> to replace or modify krb524d to just log
> the request and always return an error
> (KRB524_KRB4_DISABLED seems ideal, but as
> near as I can tell it only is used in the
> client code). Has anyone gone down this
> path before?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
I think that is reasonable. The clients already have to expect to
receive that value if the library was built without 524 support.
Jeffrey Altman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/attachments/20071017/dac6b730/attachment.bin
More information about the Kerberos
mailing list