Is this a bug?

[Jeremy Hunt]

Ken Raeburn wrote:

>[safeTgram (optim1) receive status: NOT encrypted, NOT signed.]
>
>
>On Sep 30, 2005, at 02:44, Jeremy Hunt wrote:
>  
>
>>This seems harmless enough, however further investigation shows  
>>that k5-int.h has this definition for struct _krb5_donot_replay:
>>    
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>  
>
>>and krb5-hin (which generates krb5.in after make) has this definition:
>>    
>>
>
>Not in the version in the 1.4.2 tarball I just grabbed from our web  
>site.  Nor in the initial 1.4 release I just checked out from CVS.   
>(This change was made between the 1.3 series and 1.4.)  Please re- 
>check where you got those sources from.
>  
>
You are absolutely right Ken, I had an old version of this file. Thank 
you for putting me right, and sorry I had not picked it up before 
asking. I did think I had checked that possibility beforehand.

I guess I should re-check all files before I attempt to rebuild again.

>Ken
>
>
>  
>
Cheers,

Jeremy