Assertion failuers

fariba fariba at usc.edu
Mon Jul 25 23:01:49 EDT 2005


seems like it worked. we have not been getting dead mureqds for a 
while(this is our application that was failing)

fariba wrote:

> i relinked our other application(mureqd) with the new 2.6 (thread 
> disabled) and released it,  to see if the process functions better now.
>
> Phil Dibowitz wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:53:40PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>  
>>
>>>>>>>> "fariba" == fariba  <fariba at usc.edu> writes:
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>
>>>    fariba> i work with phil as well. i was wondering what are the
>>>    fariba> proc/con of using these flags:
>>>
>>>    fariba> --disable-shared --enable-static --disable-threads
>>>
>>> It turns off threads support which gets you roughly the 1.3.x
>>> behavior.  If miltiple threads are using the library at once you can
>>> run into problems.  It disables shared libraries and enables static
>>> libraries.  That means that Kerberos is linked into each application
>>> instead of using a dynamic library.
>>>   
>>
>>
>> BTW, I didn't disable shared libraries (we need them), but I did disable
>> threads.
>>
>>  
>>
>
> ________________________________________________
> Kerberos mailing list           Kerberos at mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos




More information about the Kerberos mailing list