Kerberos vs. LDAP for authentication -- any opinions?
Dr. Greg Wettstein
greg at wind.enjellic.com
Fri Jan 30 09:43:27 EST 2004
On Jan 29, 8:45am, "Douglas E. Engert" wrote:
} Subject: Re: Kerberos vs. LDAP for authentication -- any opinions?
> Many of the Browser issues can be addressed by Kx509 from the
> Univrsity of Michigan. It can obtain a short term X509 certificate
> using Kerberos for authenticaiton. The certificate and key are then
> stored so the browser can use it with SSL to any web server. It works
> with IE and Netscape on Windows. It runs on UNIX and Mac as well.
> http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/kerb_pki/
Didn't Whit Diffey file a patent which covered the concept of using
short-term certificates as authentication brokers?
If so does the Kx509 stuff have some sort of divine absolution with
respect to it?
}-- End of excerpt from "Douglas E. Engert"
As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein, Ph.D. Enjellic Systems Development, LLC.
4206 N. 19th Ave. Specializing in information infra-structure
Fargo, ND 58102 development.
PH: 701-281-1686
FAX: 701-281-3949 EMAIL: greg at enjellic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any
good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats."
-- Howard Aiken
More information about the Kerberos
mailing list