Kerberos vs. LDAP for authentication -- any opinions?

Dr. Greg Wettstein greg at wind.enjellic.com
Fri Jan 30 09:43:27 EST 2004


On Jan 29,  8:45am, "Douglas E. Engert" wrote:
} Subject: Re: Kerberos vs. LDAP for authentication -- any opinions?

> Many of the Browser issues can be addressed by Kx509 from the 
> Univrsity of Michigan. It can obtain a short term X509 certificate 
> using Kerberos for authenticaiton. The certificate and key are then
> stored so the browser can use it with SSL to any web server. It works
> with IE and Netscape on Windows. It runs on UNIX and Mac as well. 
>   http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/kerb_pki/

Didn't Whit Diffey file a patent which covered the concept of using
short-term certificates as authentication brokers?

If so does the Kx509 stuff have some sort of divine absolution with
respect to it?

}-- End of excerpt from "Douglas E. Engert"

As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein, Ph.D.   Enjellic Systems Development, LLC.
4206 N. 19th Ave.           Specializing in information infra-structure
Fargo, ND  58102            development.
PH: 701-281-1686
FAX: 701-281-3949           EMAIL: greg at enjellic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas.  If your ideas are any
good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats."
                                -- Howard Aiken


More information about the Kerberos mailing list