Kerberized CVS

[Austin Gonyou]

Hrm...well..I think I'll setup a test box and try that out. It might be
easier maintenance. Thx!

On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 15:23, eichin-krb at thok.org wrote:
> > So you're saying gserver, versus kserver then? Just FMI.
> yes.
> 
> > With gserver and OpenSSH you would need user accounts on the box, AND
> > maintain the file with the principals. Is that not correct?
> 
> That is not correct :)
> 
> I haven't actually touched gserver in years (after all, ssh is
> actually kept up to date, and cvs doesn't do anything subtle enough to
> care) but in fact, cvs-over-ssh needs only user accounts, not a file
> with principals.
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin at coremetrics.com

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/attachments/20020419/66ff82d1/attachment.bin