[ietf-enroll] Please help with TTI model document v2

[Jim Schaad]

Max,

So this means that you would consider a data port line between the two
entities to be a mediated data flow since there is bi-direction
communication.

jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: max pritikin [mailto:pritikin at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 8:36 PM
> To: jimsch at exmsft.com
> Cc: ietf-enroll at mit.edu
> Subject: RE: [ietf-enroll] Please help with TTI model document v2
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> I don't think the difference is in the introducer's behaviour so much
> as:
> 
> >    A courier introduction could be said to be one in which 
> one element
> >    of the exchange does not supply any introduction material (or
> >    possibly that the material is supplied and the remote element
> >    refuses/ignores them).
> 
> Where in a mediated introduction there is a bi-directional data flow.
> Namely that in Figure 5 the petitioner would send some 
> introduction data (such as a public key, hash of a secret 
> key, cleartext secret key etc) back.  
> 
> 	- Max
> 
> On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 20:07, Jim Schaad wrote:
> >  Max,
> > 
> > I am in the process of reviewing this document.  During this time I 
> > have come across a problem in my thinking and I was hoping that you 
> > could potentially do some clarification for me.
> > 
> > When comparing the Courier and Mediated data flow modes.  
> What do you 
> > see as the difference in the responsiblities/activiites of 
> the introducer?
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> 
>