[ietf-enroll] Progress; not meeting in Seoul
Max Pritikin
pritikin at cisco.com
Fri Feb 20 13:59:38 EST 2004
Possibly what is lacking here is a working group owned document that
people can feel some ownership of?
The various email threads to date have mostly amounted to pointers to
various documents people have written for other projects and some
discussion of my introduction draft.
- Max
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 19:47, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
> Greetings again. The list has been waaaay too quiet over the past few
> months. We need to find a way to make some forward progress.
> Suggestions are welcome.
>
> Given that we aren't even sure what our requirements are, I believe
> that it is not appropriate to have a face-to-face meeting until we
> have a clearer direction. Thus, I have not asked for a slot at the
> Seoul IETF meeting. This is not an admission of failure, just a
> strong prod for us to get our act together on the mailing list so
> that we can have more productive face-to-face meetings.
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-enroll mailing list
> ietf-enroll at mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/ietf-enroll
More information about the ietf-enroll
mailing list