[ecco-support] [EXTERNAL] Questions about differences among different ECCO products

[David Ferreira]

Dear Ou,

I’m in proposal writing mode and wonder what are the plans to extend ECCOv4 if anything. The new release 5 goes to 2019. Is there a plan for further or some regularly planned releases, i.e. r6 up to 2021 in 2025, etc, that we could bet on for a proposal?

Cheers,
David


From: ecco-support <ecco-support-bounces at mit.edu> on behalf of Wang, Ou (US 329B) <ou.wang at jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 5:27 PM
To: ECCO support list, wider membership <ecco-support at mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [ecco-support] [EXTERNAL] Questions about differences among different ECCO products
Hello,

Thanks for your interest in using ECCO products.

I’d recommend that you first try ECCO V4r4. V4r4 is the latest release of ECCI central estimate that  has a nominal 1-degree horizontal resolution and covers the period 1992-2017. It has daily- and monthly-mean OBP available. See more details at https://ecco-group.org/products-ECCO-V4r4.htm. We also have a new product, V4r5, covering 1992-2019 that is to be officially released soon. Some of V4r5’s core variables, including OBP, are already available at https://ecco.jpl.nasa.gov/drive/files/Version4/Release5/.

You can also consider using ECCO2 (run id Cube 92) that has a higher resolution (0.25-degree) and covers the time period between 1992 and March 2022. ECCO-KFS is not recommended, as it has not been actively developed for some time and is currently not being extended in time.

Best,
Ou Wang



From: ecco-support <ecco-support-bounces at mit.edu> on behalf of 范文蓝 <fanwl57 at foxmail.com>
Date: Monday, May 8, 2023 at 8:43 PM
To: ecco-support at mit.edu <ecco-support at mit.edu>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ecco-support] Questions about differences among different ECCO products
Hi, support group,

I would like to collect Ocean Bottom Pressure (OBP) data for modelling crustal deformation, thanks to the various datasets you provide.

But the wide variety of products on the site (https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://ecco-group.org/products.htm__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!M_mcxvkKrS1u9uRFaoZ-c1r7vhK9Udi2FbS3ematgN9ENVvXLWu4AGf0ncOqbIxAuPMKIbuZH0-qo91uOay5Eg$ ) confuses me. ECCOv4r4 is the most recent version, but only ECCO2 and ECCO-KFS have been updated to now. So I wonder what the main differences, especially for OBP, between these three. Are there differences in time resolution, method accuracy, or other aspects? In addition, which dataset is more recommended for modelling pressure-induced deformation?

Thank you very much!

Best regards,

Wenlan Fan

_______________________________________________
ecco-support mailing list
ecco-support at mit.edu
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/ecco-support__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!M_mcxvkKrS1u9uRFaoZ-c1r7vhK9Udi2FbS3ematgN9ENVvXLWu4AGf0ncOqbIxAuPMKIbuZH0-qo93sfr46iw$<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/ecco-support__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!M_mcxvkKrS1u9uRFaoZ-c1r7vhK9Udi2FbS3ematgN9ENVvXLWu4AGf0ncOqbIxAuPMKIbuZH0-qo93sfr46iw$>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/ecco-support/attachments/20230523/91091373/attachment.htm>