[config-package-dev] config-package-dev 5.2 for review

[Jonathan Reed]

(re-sending is simpler than trying to remember how to use mailman)

It looks reasonable from a functionality point of view, though I'm
confused about (the new) line 63 in check-files.mk.  In the event of a
local diversion, the package name is set to "x" -- is that just a
placeholder, or is its value checked anywhere?

A use case for the local diversion might be useful to document in the
man page, but I still don't fully understand the one offered with the
patch in the first place (though I admit to mostly skimming that
thread).

So, uh, somewhere between +0 and +1.

-Jon

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk at mit.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 02:31:16AM -0400, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm planning on uploading the contents of the "geofft" branch (with
>> s/UNRELEASED/unstable/) shortly, and then also uploading trivial backports
>> to wheezy, jessie, and stretch. Anyone want to review it before I upload?
>
> I looked at it, and it seems reasonable, though I did not do a full review
> (that is, one involving loading up all the state on how this stuff works,
> etc.).
>
> -Ben
> _______________________________________________
> config-package-dev mailing list
> config-package-dev at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/config-package-dev