<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>What is an object? If the workflow is "Create Vendor Account" and
takes a bunch of input parameters for the new vendor, then why not
let it start before there is an LFA1 record in the database? You
have an object, it just isn't complete yet, it is a draft for a
vendor record. Sort of like FIPP objects.</p>
<p>But the way you describe it it may also be a workflow that
doesn't have a clue what is about to happen, so any type of object
can be created etc. I suppose it could still be a valid use case,
but it's a bit harder to imagine. How would one for instance
identify agents for the first step if you don't even know what is
going to be created.<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Den 08. mai 2018 19:08, skreiv Andy
Curtis:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADngEViuFW398Zd-H4KKroAv7M5FxD-kuP+yEMQagQ_pUxcfKQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">WUG'ers :)
(longtime no see)</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">I am
graduating to SCP Workflow and have a question, I wonder if
anyone can help me out.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">I have always
built Classic Workflows triggered after an object has been
created in a database, or SAP always saves the object and then
sends the Wf triggering event. I would say thats best
practice and it also fits with my other narrative about
keeping process and application logic separate. </div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">In SCP it is
possible to trigger a SCP Workflow without an Object, but is
that a good idea? The thought it to trigger SCP Wf and have a
step that calls a task to create the object, so the Wf is
basically generic to start with, then becomes instantiated
after the first step. Would anyone else think this is a good
idea? I don't, I think a Wf should have an object before
being started but I am having a hard time arguing the case, so
really looking for other informed opinion.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Anyone got
one?</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Andy
Curtis<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Kjetil Kilhavn</pre>
</body>
</html>