<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi Ed,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">That's a pretty daring approach, deleting
stuff out of workflow master data tables usually results in bad things.
Yes, we got the same issue in production, the BASIS guys are looking
into the RFC statuses in SM58, SCN also suggested authorisation to execute
RFCs as a possible issue but they haven't changed in this case (and before
this issue manifested, there was a period where workflows were creating,
just with a ~8 hour delay after being delivered from the event queue).
Next test is amending the workflow to 'general task,' will let everyone
know how the issue gets resolved :)</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Best Regards,<br>
James Johnson<br>
<br>
E-mail:JJohnson@uk.ibm.com<br>
Mobile: 07908715224 or 07920870270</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Edward Diehl <edwarddiehl@hotmail.com></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"SAP Workflow
Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu>, </font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">10/09/2013 19:22</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">RE: Event Raised
- WF-BATCH Configured - No Workflow</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=4 face="Garamond">Thanks, James.<br>
We were able to get workflows going again by deleting bunchs of stuff out
of SWWWIHEAD, etc. When we copied production to the test system it
was a total misfit from a capacity standpoint. Perhaps now I can
get them interested in deleting/archiving old data.<br>
<br>
Did you get that same RFC status message?</font><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
<br>
</font><font size=2 face="Tahoma"><b><br>
Ed Diehl</b></font><font size=3 face="Tahoma"><i><br>
"Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of
enthusiasm."</i> <br>
</font><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
<br>
</font>
<br>
<hr><font size=3 face="Calibri">To: sap-wug@mit.edu<br>
Subject: Re: Event Raised - WF-BATCH Configured - No Workflow<br>
From: JJOHNSON@uk.ibm.com<br>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:46:58 +0100<br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Funnily enough, this exact same issue to my client, happened over the last
couple of days. I did the workflow analysis and passed it over to
our BASIS team. If I get any response back I'll post to the group
for information. </font><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Best Regards,<br>
James Johnson<br>
<br>
E-mail:JJohnson@uk.ibm.com<br>
Mobile: 07908715224 or 07920870270</font><font size=3 face="Calibri"> <br>
<br>
<br>
</font><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif"><br>
From: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Rick
Bakker <rbakker@gmail.com></font><font size=3 face="Calibri"> </font><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif"><br>
To: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"SAP
Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu>, </font><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif"><br>
Date: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">09/09/2013
23:28</font><font size=3 face="Calibri"> </font><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif"><br>
Subject: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re:
Event Raised - WF-BATCH Configured - No Workflow</font><font size=3 face="Calibri">
</font><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif"><br>
Sent by: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</font><font size=3 face="Calibri">
<br>
</font>
<hr noshade><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
<br>
<br>
Hello Ed, <br>
<br>
Try OSS </font><font size=1 color=#2f2f2f face="Arial">Note 1025249 - Entries
in transaction SM58 "hang"</font><font size=3 face="Calibri">
</font><font size=1 color=#2f2f2f face="Arial"><br>
"If a large number of deadlines are due at the same time, some of
the entries in transaction SM58 may hang. The entries have a workflow destination
WORKFLOW_LOCAL_<xxx> (xxx denotes the client) as the target system."</font><font size=3 face="Calibri">
<br>
</font><font size=1 color=#2f2f2f face="Arial"><br>
regards</font><font size=3 face="Calibri"> </font><font size=1 color=#2f2f2f face="Arial"><br>
Rick</font><font size=3 face="Calibri"> <br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Edward Diehl <</font><a href=mailto:edwarddiehl@hotmail.com target=_blank><font size=3 color=blue face="Calibri"><u>edwarddiehl@hotmail.com</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri">>
wrote: </font><font size=4 face="Garamond"><br>
We're on SAPKB70107 - ECC 6.0<br>
<br>
We did a client copy from production to the test system. WF-BATCH
was configured after some test data did not produce workflows. After
that we STILL are not getting workflows. The Events go into the queue,
as designed. When released the events show green, but at the bottom
of the event display under RFC status:<br>
"System overloaded, repeat immediately by batch"<br>
<br>
Okay, so a couple of questions:<br>
Has anyone out there seen this before?<br>
What does system overloaded mean?<br>
And what batch process/program is it talking about?<br>
<br>
Any feedback would be appreciated.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Ed Diehl</font><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
<br>
</font><font size=2 face="Tahoma"><b><br>
<br>
Ed Diehl</b></font><font size=3 face="Tahoma"><i><br>
"Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of
enthusiasm."</i> </font><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list</font><font size=3 color=blue face="Calibri"><u><br>
</u></font><a href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu"><font size=3 color=blue face="Calibri"><u>SAP-WUG@mit.edu</u></font></a><font size=3 color=blue face="Calibri"><u><br>
</u></font><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank><font size=3 color=blue face="Calibri"><u>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="Calibri"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu</font><font size=3 color=blue face="Calibri"><u><br>
</u></font><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank><font size=2 color=blue face="Calibri"><u>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
<br>
Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. <br>
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU</font><font size=3 face="Calibri"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ SAP-WUG mailing list SAP-WUG@mit.edu
</font><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug"><font size=3 face="Calibri">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</font></a><tt><font size=2>_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
</font></tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug"><tt><font size=2>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
</font></tt>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. <br>
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU<br>
</font>