<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The delegation workflow must be depended
on the leave request workflow.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If the leave request is deleted this
must trigger an event to delete the delegation workflow<br>
</font><font size=3 color=#424282><b><br>
Regards</b></font><font size=3><br>
Nat Govender<br>
Toyota South Africa<br>
IT - SAP Workflow Specialist<br>
Internal Ext. : 32645<br>
Direct Line : +27 031 910 2645<br>
Fax : 086 607 0414<br>
E-mail : </font><a href=mailto:ngovender4@toyota.co.za><font size=3 color=blue><u>ngovender4@toyota.co.za</u></font></a><font size=3><br>
</font><font size=3 color=#ff00ff><br>
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. </font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Thomas Mann George <Thomas.Mann@hcl-axon.com></b>
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">2011/03/29 12:56 PM</font>
<table border>
<tr valign=top>
<td bgcolor=white>
<div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu></font></div></table>
<br>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"sap-wug@mit.edu" <sap-wug@mit.edu></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Another HR Leave reuqest on deleted
leave request</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Hi Friends,<br>
<br>
I got a scenario.<br>
<br>
1) Employee applied for leave say for 1st to 5th<br>
2) The leave request is approved.<br>
3) Employee sends deletion request for this leave from ESS<br>
4) Then before manager approve the deletion; employee applied another request
from 1st to 3rd.<br>
5) Manager now gets 2 requests for approval. 1) The 1st to 5th deletion
and 2) 1st to 3rd approval<br>
<br>
Even though we have configuration in Rule groups to check the un-processed
leaves, here the over lapping of leave requests are happening... and therefore
if the manager try to approve to do the approval of 1st to 3rd leave before
approving the deletion; it error outs.<br>
<br>
By any chance can we avoid this collision with a Deleted leave request?<br>
<br>
Many Thanks,<br>
Thomas.<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf
Of sap-wug-request@mit.edu<br>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 4:25 PM<br>
To: sap-wug@mit.edu<br>
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 76, Issue 47<br>
<br>
Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to<br>
sap-wug@mit.edu<br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
sap-wug-request@mit.edu<br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
sap-wug-owner@mit.edu<br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: UWL Work Item Launch Issue (md zakir)<br>
2. Re: UWL Work Item Launch Issue (Sanjay9 P)<br>
3. SRM BRF Workflow (jayachandra reddy)<br>
4. Release Strategy User in Purchase Req. (Ibrahim)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:19:44 -0400<br>
From: md zakir <md.sapall@gmail.com><br>
Subject: Re: UWL Work Item Launch Issue<br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<AANLkTinRNr6M6uEhHSwowgJ=0Wnj37KZWuana+-T0Mq3@mail.gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Mark,<br>
<br>
Yes, It has been re-registered.<br>
<br>
I have a very little knowledge on portal, Could you please clarify a bit<br>
more on what you mean by 'dedicated UWL RFC connection'.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Z<br>
<br>
<br>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Griffiths, Mark <mark.griffiths@sap.com>wrote:<br>
<br>
> Have you re-registered the UWL and cleared the cache in the UWL<br>
> administration area after changing SWFVISU?<br>
><br>
> Has your portal person set up the dedicated UWL RFC connection?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Mark<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> *From:* sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] *On<br>
> Behalf Of *md zakir<br>
> *Sent:* 28 March 2011 16:48<br>
> *To:* sap-wug@mit.edu<br>
> *Subject:* UWL Work Item Launch Issue<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Hello,<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Whenever I try to execute CATS approval work item from UWL, I get
an<br>
> error ' Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage'. I am
using Webdypro<br>
> application 'CatsManagerApprove' and task ID TS31000007.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I tried to change visualization parameter using transaction 'SWFVISU'
but<br>
> nothing has worked.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
> Z<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> .<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110328/9a607412/attachment-0001.htm<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:11:45 +0530<br>
From: Sanjay9 P <sanjay9.p@tcs.com><br>
Subject: Re: UWL Work Item Launch Issue<br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
Cc: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu>,<br>
sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<OFF2ECA6D8.15722F22-ON65257862.0019996A-65257862.0019CD29@tcs.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Hi Z,<br>
<br>
Have u changed the xml code ( in Portal ) accordingly ?<br>
If not please change the xml code with the Task ID and the WD application<br>
name.<br>
After that please test the whole scenario from beginning.<br>
<br>
Sanjay Pal<br>
Asst System Engineer<br>
Tata Consultancy Services<br>
Mailto: sanjay9.p@tcs.com<br>
Website: http://www.tcs.com<br>
____________________________________________<br>
Experience certainty. IT Services<br>
Business Solutions<br>
Outsourcing<br>
____________________________________________<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From:<br>
md zakir <md.sapall@gmail.com><br>
To:<br>
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
Date:<br>
03/28/2011 10:00 PM<br>
Subject:<br>
Re: UWL Work Item Launch Issue<br>
Sent by:<br>
sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Mark,<br>
<br>
Yes, It has been re-registered.<br>
<br>
I have a very little knowledge on portal, Could you please clarify a bit<br>
more on what you mean by 'dedicated UWL RFC connection'.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Z<br>
<br>
<br>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Griffiths, Mark <mark.griffiths@sap.com><br>
wrote:<br>
Have you re-registered the UWL and cleared the cache in the UWL<br>
administration area after changing SWFVISU?<br>
Has your portal person set up the dedicated UWL RFC connection?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
<br>
From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf<br>
Of md zakir<br>
Sent: 28 March 2011 16:48<br>
To: sap-wug@mit.edu<br>
Subject: UWL Work Item Launch Issue<br>
<br>
Hello,<br>
<br>
Whenever I try to execute CATS approval work item from UWL, I get an<br>
error ' Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage'. I am using<br>
Webdypro application 'CatsManagerApprove' and task ID TS31000007.<br>
<br>
I tried to change visualization parameter using transaction 'SWFVISU' but<br>
nothing has worked.<br>
<br>
Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Z<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
<br>
<br>
=====-----=====-----=====<br>
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail<br>
message and/or attachments to it may contain<br>
confidential or privileged information. If you are<br>
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,<br>
review, distribution, printing or copying of the<br>
information contained in this e-mail message<br>
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If<br>
you have received this communication in error,<br>
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and<br>
immediately and permanently delete the message<br>
and any attachments. Thank you<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110329/cc4dda50/attachment-0001.htm<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:51:40 +0530 (IST)<br>
From: jayachandra reddy <djayachandrareddy@yahoo.co.in><br>
Subject: SRM BRF Workflow<br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
Message-ID: <268937.97441.qm@web137402.mail.in.yahoo.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
We are using standard workflow WS40000014 for shopping cart. Subworkflow<br>
WS40000016 is being used in the same. Task TS40007953 is being displayed
in<br>
workflow log, but as per workflow definition, task TS40007943 is used.<br>
<br>
<br>
We are planning to introduce Program exits to task. As per workflow definition<br>
since we are not able to see task TS40007953, will not be able to attach
program<br>
exits.<br>
<br>
<br>
Please let me know if there is any alternative procedure for acheving this.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Jay<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110329/54ed3cd5/attachment-0001.htm<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:24:13 +0400<br>
From: Ibrahim <ikhansap@gmail.com><br>
Subject: Release Strategy User in Purchase Req.<br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <SAP-WUG@mit.edu><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<AANLkTikWnvbPsvtparfRq8JjG0ivs-iJ0BeVwfyLnHZX@mail.gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Hi Friends,<br>
We are using user exit to determine the Purchase Req. Approvers. In<br>
ME52N/ME53N under the Release Strategy Tab there is a table which shows
the<br>
Approver name and description against each Release code. In our case we
have<br>
multiple approvers(users which are maintained in a custom table) against<br>
each release code, but the system shows only one approver(user) against<br>
release code in this tab. Is there any way to show all the approvers<br>
there(i.e.multiple rows against each release code).<br>
<br>
The issue we are facing is lets say we have user Beta who is the
*Manager *and<br>
user Alpha who is a the *Secretary *of that Manager, we have maintained
both<br>
these users as approvers in the custom table as both are eligible to approve<br>
and the work item is going to both of them, but in ME52N/ME53N under Release<br>
stratergy tab* it shows only the Secretary name since alphabetically it<br>
comes first, but the user wants us to show both of them. *<br>
<br>
To be precise all I want is that my Purchase Req. Release Strategy tab<br>
should show all the approvers along with release codes .Please advise.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
IK<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110329/64ce27e0/attachment.htm<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
<br>
<br>
End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 76, Issue 47<br>
***************************************<br>
<br>
Disclaimer: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential
and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability
on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented
in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect
the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination,
copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
this message without prior written consent of the author of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please
delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.<br>
<br>
Axon Solutions Limited. Registered Office: Axon Centre, Church Road, Egham,
Surrey, TW20 9QB, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Company No.
2976395. Axon Solutions Limited is a limited company.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
</font></tt>
<br><font face="monospace"><br>
***** This e-mail is a privileged and private communication and may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, please inform the sender by return e-mail with the subject heading "Received in error". Please then delete the e-mail; destroy any copies of it and do not disclose its contents to any person or entity. If you are not the intended recipient, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Neither the sender nor Toyota South Africa Motors (Pty) Ltd accepts any liability whatsoever as a result of the further dissemination of this e-mail. Toyota South Africa Motors (Pty) Ltd does not guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. *****</font>