<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">
<div>Krishna,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Updating the WF technical data in the runtime environment is the easiest way to hit your deadlines without waiting. </div>
<div>I doubt you want to change system dates or change the development (and transport) or direct table updates.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>T</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: Krishna K Kammaje <<a href="mailto:kkammaje@in.ibm.com">kkammaje@in.ibm.com</a>><br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<a href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</a>><br>Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:21:02 +0530<br>Subject: Re: Testing Workflow deadlines, wait steps, logically deleted cases etc.<br>
<font face="sans-serif" size="2">Hi Tom,</font> <br><br><font face="sans-serif" size="2">As written in my email, I am looking for a solution, where I do not have to get into technicals of a workitem. I am very well aware of changing deadlines.</font> <br>
<br><font face="sans-serif" size="2">Thanks<br>Krishna Kishor Kammaje <br></font><br><br><br><br><font face="sans-serif" color="#5f5f5f" size="1">From: </font><font face="sans-serif" size="1">Tom Peou <<a href="mailto:tompeou@gmail.com" target="_blank">tompeou@gmail.com</a>></font> <br>
<font face="sans-serif" color="#5f5f5f" size="1">To: </font><font face="sans-serif" size="1"><a href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" target="_blank">sap-wug@mit.edu</a></font> <br><font face="sans-serif" color="#5f5f5f" size="1">Date: </font><font face="sans-serif" size="1">23/03/2011 14:36</font> <br>
<font face="sans-serif" color="#5f5f5f" size="1">Subject: </font><font face="sans-serif" size="1">Re: Testing Workflow deadlines, wait steps, logically deleted cases etc.</font> <br><font face="sans-serif" color="#5f5f5f" size="1">Sent by: </font><font face="sans-serif" size="1"><a href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu" target="_blank">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</a></font> <br>
<hr noshade>
<br><br><br><font size="3">Hi Krishna,</font> <br><font size="3"> </font> <br><font size="3">You can change the deadline in the runtime environment by the following method:</font> <br><font size="3">1. Go to the workflow log for the instance required.</font> <br>
<font size="3">2. Click on the task with the deadline monitoring set.</font> <br><font size="3">3. Then click on the menu 'Goto' -> 'Technical Work Item Display'.</font> <br><font size="3">4. Select 'Edit' -> 'Change' from the menu.</font> <br>
<font size="3">5. You should have the option available to 'Change Deadlines'.</font> <br><font size="3">6. Update your deadline forward to a few minutes from now and as long as SWWDHEX is running, then that work item should hit the deadlines you've set. </font> <br>
<font size="3"> </font> <br><font size="3">Cheers,</font> <br><font size="3">Tom</font> <br><font size="3"><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: Krishna K Kammaje <</font><a href="mailto:kkammaje@in.ibm.com" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>kkammaje@in.ibm.com</u></font></a><font size="3">><br>
To: </font><a href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>SAP-WUG@mit.edu</u></font></a><font size="3"><br>Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:03:45 +0530<br>Subject: Testing Workflow deadlines, wait steps, logically deleted cases etc.</font><font face="sans-serif" size="2"><br>
Hi friends</font><font size="3"> <br></font><font face="sans-serif" size="2"><br>Our functional testers usually find it tough to test workflow deadlines. Basically because, it involves changing the deadlines, sometimes testing logically deleted scenario, sometimes completing wait steps (ex: wait for two days). So they are dependent on technical team for performing these actions.</font><font size="3"> <br>
</font><font face="sans-serif" size="2"><br>What is the best way to get this done? <br>Is there any option similar to changing sy-datum to simulate these deadlines? (I feel changing sy-datum itself can be very risky and can create db inconsistencies). I am looking for any other ways which functional testers can use, without actually getting into technical data of work items.</font><font size="3"> <br>
</font><font face="sans-serif" size="2"><br>Please share your experience.</font><font size="3"> <br></font><font face="sans-serif" size="2"><br>Thanks<br>Krishna Kishor Kammaje </font><font size="3"><br></font><tt><font size="2">_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br><a href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" target="_blank">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a><br></font></tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target="_blank"><tt><font size="2">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</font></tt></a><tt><font size="2"><br>
</font></tt><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>SAP-WUG mailing list<br><a href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a><br><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target="_blank">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>