<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.30.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Hi Mike and Marton, and all<BR>
<BR>
First thanks for your replies<BR>
<BR>
I would like to reply first to you and then provide the solution I have found :<BR>
<BR>
Marton, there is no issue in the MM area, as I said in my message, whatever the amount we do only have one release strategy and this release strategy is only containing one step, the approver in this step is found via user exit,<BR>
More explanation : checking the responsible of the cost object (account assignment) then via RFC we are comparing the total value of the purchase requisition to the approval limit of the user in SRM and if not sufficient then we are checking the approval limit of his manager, until we find the right approver.<BR>
<BR>
In MM, the setting for amount of quantity on release strategy is only working for release code that have done their release. In my case the release is not yet done so the value checks are not working.<BR>
<BR>
Mike, in your reply I think you are mixing the event releasestepcreated and signicantlychanged. <BR>
<BR>
In the workflow we have set up the significantlychanged event is raised whenever EBAN_MENGE or EBAN_PREIS is changed (due to the settings done in SWEC)<BR>
<BR>
My problem if not explain clearly the first time, is when the workflow is in process (PR not yet release) and a purchase requisitioner is adding a new item in the PR, no event change or significantly changed is being raised. Releasestepcreated is not raised either butSo that is normal behavior because my release strategy and release step are not changing according to MM settings.<BR>
<BR>
So I have found that the new item is not triggering a change event but a creation event (which is funny cause I am working on BUs2105 pR and not BUs0009 PR line item) <BR>
so basically to capture the event I inserted a new entry in SWEC on BUS2105 on creation (using the create event) with criteria Eban-Bnfpo_old not existing<BR>
<BR>
And then the event is triggered as soon as the new item is added.<BR>
<BR>
I hope my explanation is clear and can help others (no development is needed here) <BR>
<BR>
Message: 3
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:11:45 -0000
From: "Mike Pokraka" <<A HREF="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com">wug@workflowconnections.com</A>>
Subject: Re: PR MOdification
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@MIT.EDU">sap-wug@MIT.EDU</A>>
Message-ID:
<<A HREF="mailto:a3383ffc85da8989ee57f06098bfb46a.squirrel@g.mail.aaisp.net.uk">a3383ffc85da8989ee57f06098bfb46a.squirrel@g.mail.aaisp.net.uk</A>>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Hi Stephane,
This is correct behaviour. e.g. a release strategy is up to a value of
5000 and a PR is for 3000, pending approval. The PR is changed to a value
of 3500. ==> Same approver.
Significantlychanged is only raised whenever a change causes a new release
strategy. Change the value to 5001 and a new release strategy is
determined.
If you need the system to behave differently then you need to do some
custom work as Marton suggested.
Cheers,
Mike
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Message: 3</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:10:24 +0100</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">From: M?rton Zsolt <<A HREF="mailto:Marton.Zsolt@iqsys.hu">Marton.Zsolt@iqsys.hu</A>></FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Subject: RE: PR MOdification</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>></FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Message-ID:</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a"> <<A HREF="mailto:92C25DF364C62443A7507663B3179C8CCB1642@BPIMBX01.iqsys.telekom.intra">92C25DF364C62443A7507663B3179C8CCB1642@BPIMBX01.iqsys.telekom.intra</A>></FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Hi Stephane,</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">I think this is an MM issue. The release startegi redetermination can be set in MM customizing, but if the value or quantity change is below the ?old? release startegie limit, than the redetermination will not be carried out, therfore no event is triggered. </FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">We have similar problems, and we implemented a customer badi to trigger our custom event every time when the PR change fullfills our criteria.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">br</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">zsolt</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a"> </FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a"> </FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">From: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On Behalf Of Stephane Bailleul</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:00 PM</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">To: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A></FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Subject: PR MOdification</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a"> </FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Hi all, </FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">On an ECC6 system, We are using release strategy on PR with a only one step with user exit we are determining dynamically according to the amount of the PR the unique approver.</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">At creation, or release it is working fine.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">However for modification there are some complication, when the PR is not yet approved</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">First I noticed that the changes (like price modification or quantity modification) were not triggering a new release strategy (of course there is only one now with one step !!)</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">So in transaction SWEC I used the event significantly changed on update with some criteria relevant for our workflow, </FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Then I noticed that creating a new line item was not considered as a change on the PR, so was not triggering the event significantlychanged event ....so the release strategy has the right approver but not the workitem ...</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Do someone have a workaround ? a way to trigger the change event or significantlychanged event for the Pr in order to restart the workflow ?</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Best regards</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">stephane</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 12:21 -0500, sap-wug-request@mit.edu a écrit :
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
<A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</A>
You can reach the person managing the list at
<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu">sap-wug-owner@mit.edu</A>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report (Manish Khanna)
2. RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report (Mike Pokraka)
3. Re: PR MOdification (Mike Pokraka)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:09:22 +0530
From: Manish Khanna <<A HREF="mailto:mkhanna@sapient.com">mkhanna@sapient.com</A>>
Subject: RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>>
Message-ID:
<<A HREF="mailto:9F307AC6AA617F45B8848821D7D829461F59EF24E8@DELMAIL.sapient.com">9F307AC6AA617F45B8848821D7D829461F59EF24E8@DELMAIL.sapient.com</A>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks Sheldon/Mike and others.
Seems, these are my only options. At first get the list of active definitions via SWDM and then use the below transactions to find the usage.
--
Manish
-----Original Message-----
From: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On Behalf Of Sheldon Oxenberg
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:39 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
Hi Manish,
You could try using standard SAP Workflow report transactions SWI2_FREQ and
SWI2_DURA.
Regards.
SHELDON OXENBERG
System Architect Principal Leader
LMP Technical Architect, SAP Workflow
CSC
From: Manish Khanna <<A HREF="mailto:mkhanna@sapient.com">mkhanna@sapient.com</A>>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>>
Date: 11/16/2010 03:55 AM
Subject: RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
Sorry, couldn't phrase it properly.
By useful, I meant workflow definitions that are active in production and
are regularly used in day to day business
By usability, I meant average work items generated per day per workflow
Not sure of any other parameters/indicators that can be helpful for such a
report.
Thanks
Manish
From: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On
Behalf Of JANSSENS Koenraad
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 1:58 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
What do you mean with "useful"?
What do you mean with "average usability"?
It might be because I'm not an English-native speaker but I find the
descriptions quite vague.
Anyway... the functionality you will search can most probably be found
by using one of the valuable SAP_WAPI* functions.
Best Regards
Koenraad
From: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On
Behalf Of Manish Khanna
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 8:21 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
Hi,
My client has asked me to prepare a usability report for the
workflows in production. They would like to know
1) How many active useful workflows we have in production
2) What is average usability per workflow
Has anyone prepared such report and share few inputs? Besides, how to
find total active useful workflows in production?
Thanks
Manish _______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
<A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
<A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:03:16 -0000 (GMT)
From: "Mike Pokraka" <<A HREF="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com">wug@workflowconnections.com</A>>
Subject: RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>>
Message-ID:
<<A HREF="mailto:60939f1c269b309528cfa900e7d9bf95.squirrel@g.mail.aaisp.net.uk">60939f1c269b309528cfa900e7d9bf95.squirrel@g.mail.aaisp.net.uk</A>>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Not sure what you mean by "only options". It does exactly what you asked
for. Looking at usage will automatically tell you which ones are active.
Non active worklows won't appear in the reports. Active ones do.
Cheers,
Mike
On Thu, November 18, 2010 6:39 am, Manish Khanna wrote:
> Thanks Sheldon/Mike and others.
>
> Seems, these are my only options. At first get the list of active
> definitions via SWDM and then use the below transactions to find the
> usage.
>
> --
> Manish
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On Behalf
> Of Sheldon Oxenberg
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:39 PM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
>
> Hi Manish,
>
> You could try using standard SAP Workflow report transactions SWI2_FREQ
> and
> SWI2_DURA.
>
> Regards.
>
> SHELDON OXENBERG
> System Architect Principal Leader
> LMP Technical Architect, SAP Workflow
> CSC
>
>
>
> From: Manish Khanna <<A HREF="mailto:mkhanna@sapient.com">mkhanna@sapient.com</A>>
>
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>>
>
> Date: 11/16/2010 03:55 AM
>
> Subject: RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sorry, couldn't phrase it properly.
>
> By useful, I meant workflow definitions that are active in production and
> are regularly used in day to day business
> By usability, I meant average work items generated per day per workflow
>
> Not sure of any other parameters/indicators that can be helpful for such a
> report.
>
> Thanks
> Manish
>
> From: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On
> Behalf Of JANSSENS Koenraad
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 1:58 PM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
>
> What do you mean with "useful"?
> What do you mean with "average usability"?
>
> It might be because I'm not an English-native speaker but I find the
> descriptions quite vague.
>
> Anyway... the functionality you will search can most probably be
> found
> by using one of the valuable SAP_WAPI* functions.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Koenraad
>
> From: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On
> Behalf Of Manish Khanna
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 8:21 AM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: SAP workflows in production : Usability report
>
> Hi,
>
> My client has asked me to prepare a usability report for the
> workflows in production. They would like to know
> 1) How many active useful workflows we have in production
> 2) What is average usability per workflow
>
> Has anyone prepared such report and share few inputs? Besides, how
> to
> find total active useful workflows in production?
>
> Thanks
> Manish _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> <A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> <A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> <A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:11:45 -0000 (GMT)
From: "Mike Pokraka" <<A HREF="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com">wug@workflowconnections.com</A>>
Subject: Re: PR MOdification
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@MIT.EDU">sap-wug@MIT.EDU</A>>
Message-ID:
<<A HREF="mailto:a3383ffc85da8989ee57f06098bfb46a.squirrel@g.mail.aaisp.net.uk">a3383ffc85da8989ee57f06098bfb46a.squirrel@g.mail.aaisp.net.uk</A>>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Hi Stephane,
This is correct behaviour. e.g. a release strategy is up to a value of
5000 and a PR is for 3000, pending approval. The PR is changed to a value
of 3500. ==> Same approver.
Significantlychanged is only raised whenever a change causes a new release
strategy. Change the value to 5001 and a new release strategy is
determined.
If you need the system to behave differently then you need to do some
custom work as Marton suggested.
Cheers,
Mike
On Wed, November 17, 2010 8:00 pm, Stephane Bailleul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On an ECC6 system, We are using release strategy on PR with a only one
> step with user exit we are determining dynamically according to the
> amount of the PR the unique approver.
> At creation, or release it is working fine.
>
> However for modification there are some complication, when the PR is
> not yet approved
>
> First I noticed that the changes (like price modification or quantity
> modification) were not triggering a new release strategy (of course
> there is only one now with one step !!)
> So in transaction SWEC I used the event significantly changed on update
> with some criteria relevant for our workflow,
>
> Then I noticed that creating a new line item was not considered as a
> change on the PR, so was not triggering the event significantlychanged
> event ....so the release strategy has the right approver but not the
> workitem ...
>
> Do someone have a workaround ? a way to trigger the change event or
> significantlychanged event for the Pr in order to restart the workflow ?
> Best regards
> stephane
>
>
> Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 ?? 12:22 -0500, sap-wug-rethe <A HREF="mailto:quest@mit.edu">quest@mit.edu</A>
> a ??crit :best
>
>> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
>> <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.eduPR">sap-wug@mit.eduPR</A>
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</A>
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu">sap-wug-owner@mit.edu</A>
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Stupid Question (so now you have to read it ...;-) -
>> Regarding Delegations (<A HREF="mailto:michael.mcley@daimler.com">michael.mcley@daimler.com</A>)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:53:39 -0600
>> From: <A HREF="mailto:michael.mcley@daimler.com">michael.mcley@daimler.com</A>
>> Subject: Re: Stupid Question (so now you have to read it ...;-) -
>> Regarding Delegations
>> To: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>
>> Message-ID:
>> <<A HREF="mailto:OF9D83ECDA.02A5A9D3-ON862577DE.0057390C-862577DE.005755DD@dcx.dcx">OF9D83ECDA.02A5A9D3-ON862577DE.0057390C-862577DE.005755DD@dcx.dcx</A>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Sheldon,
>>
>> GOOD CATCH. I don't talk to those guys much ;-) I'll ask him. Thx.
>>
>> Michael McLey
>> MBUSI - IT Parts & Administration
>> Mercedes-Benz US International, Inc.
>> 1 Mercedes Drive
>> Vance, AL 35490
>> PHONE: (205) 462 - 5239
>> EMAIL: <A HREF="mailto:michael.mcley@daimler.com">michael.mcley@daimler.com</A>
>>
>>
>>
>> <A HREF="mailto:soxenber@csc.com">soxenber@csc.com</A>
>> Sent by: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>
>> 11/17/2010 09:29 AM
>> Please respond to
>> <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>
>>
>>
>> To
>> <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> Re: Stupid Question (so now you have to read it ...;-) - Regarding
>> Delegations
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I also did some gOOgling...
>> It appears that Quintus Bell is a SAP CRM Developer at Mercedes Benz
>> South
>> Africa / Sofware developer at Mondial IT Solutions?
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> SHELDON OXENBERG
>> System Architect Principal Leader
>> LMP Technical Architect, SAP Workflow
>> CSC
>>
>>
>>
>> From: <A HREF="mailto:michael.mcley@daimler.com">michael.mcley@daimler.com</A>
>>
>> To: <A HREF="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>
>>
>> Date: 11/17/2010 10:03 AM
>>
>> Subject: Stupid Question (so now you have to read it ...;-) -
>> Regarding Delegations
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Wuggers,
>>
>> I need to make a couple of system-wide delegations for one of my
>> workflow
>> projects. From what I have read of system-wide delegations, they are
>> kind
>> of a 1 time / 1 step configuration, meaning that you cannot cascade
>> delegations from one object to another, to another, etc... . And also, a
>> delegation from a standard object can occur only 1 time. So once I have
>> delegated a standard BUSxxxx object to another object, there is no
>> possibility to further delegate that base object.
>>
>> So now, when I look at my current system delegations I find there are
>> already several delegations of standard SAP BUSxxxx objects (BUS2010,
>> 2011,
>> 2081, etc..) to some ADBxxxx objects. The person responsible for these
>> delegations is "QUINTUS" who is not a user in our system.
>>
>> Does anyone know if these are delegations provided by SAP, or should I
>> be
>> looking for some add-in (or something else) that created these
>> delegations?
>> No one who was here before me knows anything about them. Also is it
>> safe
>> to delete these delegations (assuming I do some research to ensure we
>> are
>> not using them) if they are provided by SAP?
>>
>> Tried gOOgling it, found a lot of information relating to a company
>> named
>> Quintus Corp, but not much else. Not much in OSS either. Thanks for
>> your
>> help.
>>
>>
>> Michael McLey
>> MBUSI - IT Parts & Administration
>> Mercedes-Benz US International, Inc.
>> 1 Mercedes Drive
>> Vance, AL 35490
>> PHONE: (205) 462 - 5239
>> EMAIL: <A HREF="mailto:michael.mcley@daimler.com">michael.mcley@daimler.com</A>
>> If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that
>> you have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank you for
>> your cooperation. _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> <A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
>> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> <A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
>> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that
>> you have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank you for
>> your cooperation.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20101117/009e93eb/attachment-0001.htm">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20101117/009e93eb/attachment-0001.htm</A>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> <A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
>> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>>
>>
>> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 72, Issue 40
>> ***************************************
>
>
> --
> Stephane Bailleul
> Consultant SAP SRM/MM/Workflow
>
> GSM: +33 6 14 08 32 50
> FAX: +33 9 56 62 24 40
> Email: <A HREF="mailto:stephanebailleul@free.fr">stephanebailleul@free.fr</A>
>
> <A HREF="http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephanebailleul">http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephanebailleul</A>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> <A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
> <A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
<A HREF="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 72, Issue 42
***************************************
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
-- <BR>
Stephane Bailleul<BR>
Consultant SAP SRM/MM/Workflow<BR>
<BR>
GSM: +33 6 14 08 32 50<BR>
FAX: +33 9 56 62 24 40<BR>
Email: <A HREF="mailto:stephanebailleul@free.fr">stephanebailleul@free.fr</A><BR>
<BR>
<A HREF="http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephanebailleul">http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephanebailleul</A>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>