Thanks guys!<br><br>Some updates:<br><br>We have been using PV7i and PV8i transactions for training booking and cancellation, and this FM is being called within FM
<style type="text/css">
SPAN {
font-family: "Courier New";
font-size: 10pt;
color: #000000;
background: #FFFFFF;
}
</style>
<span>RH_GET_ATTENDEE_ACTIVITIES</span>
that in turn is called in the above transactions. I will wait for their response prior to considering a change to <span>RH_GET_ATTENDEE_ACTIVITIES.</span><br><br>I also don't wish to change the persistence profile on the workflow without knowing its implications especially after Eddie' response here <a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/2009-December/031753.html">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/2009-December/031753.html</a><br>
<br>The FM RH_GET_ATTENDEE_WORKITEMS was last changed in 2009.<br><br>I have raised an OSS message waiting to hear back from SAP.<br><br>Regards<br>Ravi<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:06 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target="_blank">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu">sap-wug-owner@mit.edu</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. RE: SWW_CONTOB entries missing (Mike Gambier)<br>
2. Re: SWW_CONTOB entries missing (Mike Pokraka)<br>
3. Re: Forward Workitem (Sheldon Oxenberg)<br>
4. Modify Ad-hoc approver screen (Lalitha Sankaran)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:56:43 +0000<br>
From: Mike Gambier <<a href="mailto:madgambler@hotmail.com">madgambler@hotmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: RE: SWW_CONTOB entries missing<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</a>><br>
Message-ID: <SNT107-W112102BC3E02A51FD4D9C4D5B20@phx.gbl><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
<br>
Ravi,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
At first glance this would sound like a genuine OSS message needs to be raised. SAP's code should work regrdless of which Container option you've chosen, especially if you're calling an 'RH_*' Function Module.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
But looking at the code inside that FM I'd be a little concerned if I were you that the code hasn't been touched since 2003 and the Database View it depends on (SWIVOBJECT) not adjusted since 2005 and entirely dependent on SWW_CONTOB.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Fundamentally I think you have a bigger functional issue here in that the code you are currently relying in simply could not cope with the changes that came in as part of ECC 6.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
You may want to ask SAP if they can suggest an alternative option entirely.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
If you plan on continuing to use this FM and how it currently works then you must switch your WFs back to the 'old' Persistence profile as the FM is completely unaware of the new XML approach.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Mike GT<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:04:31 +1000<br>
Subject: SWW_CONTOB entries missing<br>
From: <a href="mailto:dolbydix@gmail.com">dolbydix@gmail.com</a><br>
To: <a href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</a><br>
<br>
Hello Fellow WUGgers<br>
<br>
I have developed a new workflow in ECC6 and it has defaulted the Persistence profile (Workflow Builder => Basic Data => Version Dependent => Control tab ) to XML Persistence. What this does is it does not create enrtries in SWW_CONTOB. The standard FM RH_GET_ATTENDEE_WORKITEMS reads the view<br>
<br>
swivobject and there are no results returned, which in turn affects the data displayed to the attendee when they click on their Training History in ESS.<br>
<br>
I could not find any recent notes for this FM.<br>
<br>
My question is, what are the implications of changing the persistence profile? Or Should I be changing the standard code to read the correct tables?<br>
<br>
Thanks for your help.<br>
--<br>
Best Regards<br>
Ravi Dixit<br>
<br>
_________________________________________________________________<br>
<a href="http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/" target="_blank">http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/</a><br>
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100706/53ba2402/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20100706/53ba2402/attachment-0001.htm</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:19:57 +0100 (BST)<br>
From: "Mike Pokraka" <<a href="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com">wug@workflowconnections.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: SWW_CONTOB entries missing<br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<a href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:be5e963a99d82dc5b578748cfd28895f.squirrel@g.mail.aaisp.net.uk">be5e963a99d82dc5b578748cfd28895f.squirrel@g.mail.aaisp.net.uk</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1<br>
<br>
Based on Mike's comments I'd be inclined to give up on it and write your<br>
own using SAP_WAPI_WORKITEMS_TO_OBJECT.<br>
Most of the HR stuff is gradually being replaced by OO so there's<br>
sometimes little hope of getting these things updated. For that type of<br>
function I'd personally think it less effort to write my own or look for a<br>
class than to go the OSS route.<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, July 6, 2010 3:04 am, Ravi Dixit wrote:<br>
> Hello Fellow WUGgers<br>
><br>
> I have developed a new workflow in ECC6 and it has defaulted the<br>
> Persistence<br>
> profile (Workflow Builder => Basic Data => Version Dependent => Control<br>
> tab<br>
> ) to *XML Persistence.* What this does is it does not create enrtries in<br>
> SWW_CONTOB. The standard FM *RH_GET_ATTENDEE_WORKITEMS *reads the view *<br>
> swivobject* and there are no results returned, which in turn affects the<br>
> data displayed to the attendee when they click on their Training History<br>
> in<br>
> ESS.<br>
><br>
> I could not find any recent notes for this FM.<br>
><br>
> My question is, what are the implications of changing the persistence<br>
> profile? Or Should I be changing the standard code to read the correct<br>
> tables?<br>
><br>
> Thanks for your help.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Best Regards<br>
> Ravi Dixit<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a><br>
> <a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target="_blank">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br>