<html><body>
<p>Is the field in the workflow the same as the in the rule?<br>
<br>
Check the binding in the task.<br>
<br>
Also test the task itself.<br>
<b><font size="4" color="#483D8B"><br>
Regards</font></b><font size="4"><br>
Nat Govender<br>
Toyota South Africa<br>
IT - SAP Workflow Specialist<br>
Internal Ext. : 32645<br>
Direct Line : +27 031 910 2645<br>
Fax : 086 607 0414<br>
E-mail : </font><a href="mailto:ngovender4@toyota.co.za"><u><font size="4" color="#0000FF">ngovender4@toyota.co.za</font></u></a><font size="4"><br>
</font><font size="4" color="#FF00FF"><br>
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. </font><br>
<img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for "Viera, Miguel" <VieraM@dhcmc.com>">"Viera, Miguel" <VieraM@dhcmc.com><br>
<br>
<br>
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr valign="top"><td style="background-image:url(cid:2__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za); background-repeat: no-repeat; " width="40%">
<ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<ul><b><font size="2">"Viera, Miguel" <VieraM@dhcmc.com></font></b><font size="2"> </font><br>
<font size="2">Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</font>
<p><font size="2">21-07-2009 02:45 PM</font>
<table border="1">
<tr valign="top"><td width="168" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div align="center"><font size="2">Please respond to<br>
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu></font></div></td></tr>
</table>
</ul>
</ul>
</ul>
</ul>
</td><td width="60%">
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr valign="top"><td width="1%"><img width="58" height="1" src="cid:3__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt=""><br>
<div align="right"><font size="2">To</font></div></td><td width="100%"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt=""><br>
<font size="2">"'sap-wug@mit.edu'" <sap-wug@mit.edu></font></td></tr>
<tr valign="top"><td width="1%"><img width="58" height="1" src="cid:3__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt=""><br>
<div align="right"><font size="2">cc</font></div></td><td width="100%"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt=""><br>
</td></tr>
<tr valign="top"><td width="1%"><img width="58" height="1" src="cid:3__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt=""><br>
<div align="right"><font size="2">Subject</font></div></td><td width="100%"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt=""><br>
<font size="2">Re: Question regarding creating a rule based on vendor</font></td></tr>
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr valign="top"><td width="58"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt=""></td><td width="336"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=CDBBFF69DFD5FA1E8f9e8a93df9@toyota.co.za" border="0" alt=""></td></tr>
</table>
</td></tr>
</table>
<br>
<tt>Nat,<br>
<br>
The from value and the to value are the same in the rule. I do have multiple from and to values assigned per rule due to the number of vendors assigned to a specific position.<br>
<br>
EX. <br>
Name From To <br>
Vendor 2 2<br>
Vendor 22 22<br>
<br>
I have checked "consider secondary priorities" and numbered the rules 1 through 5; however, when I initiate a Price Block Workflow the position chosen through my rule ends up being the highest priority regardless of whether it is their assigned vendor from the rule. The strange thing is that this is testing successfully for the different rules I have created in "Simulate rule resolution." <br>
<br>
Thanks for your comment.<br>
<br>
Miguel R. Viera<br>
Deere-Hitachi C.M.C<br>
SAP Business Analyst for FI-CO & SD Modules<br>
Workflow Admin. & Winshuttle Template Designer<br>
Phone: (336) 992-5759<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [<a href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</a>] On Behalf Of sap-wug-request@mit.edu<br>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 12:45 AM<br>
To: sap-wug@mit.edu<br>
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 56, Issue 39<br>
<br>
Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to<br>
sap-wug@mit.edu<br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
</tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a></tt><tt><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
sap-wug-request@mit.edu<br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
sap-wug-owner@mit.edu<br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. ABAP OO objects as BOR method parameters. (Sharath K)<br>
2. RE: Issue with terminating event (David Trant)<br>
3. Re: UWL configuration Wizard dropdowns in EP7 (Sandy)<br>
4. Re: Question regarding creating a rule based on vendor<br>
responsibility (Nat 4 Govender)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:48:58 -0700 (PDT)<br>
From: Sharath K <ksharath77@yahoo.com><br>
Subject: ABAP OO objects as BOR method parameters.<br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
Message-ID: <806084.80004.qm@web39705.mail.mud.yahoo.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Hi all, Here I am repostig the issue(seems my emails are ending in Junk folder). <br>
?I am trying to return a class object from business<br>
object method to workflow container. I am not using this is class object in any<br>
of my tasks, using just as parameter..<br>
<br>
? <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Issue-1: I am unable to class object as BOR method parameter, I cant see any options to choose ABAP class<br>
type..the only two options are (i)ABAP Dictionary, (ii) Object type.. Is it a version issue..the client is on R/3 4.7.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
? <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Issue-2: Object reference is not passed to task<br>
container with SWC_SET_ELEMENT CONTAINER macro from BOT method.<br>
<br>
? <br>
<br>
Issue-3: I have not implemented IF_WORKFLOW methods in the class..Do I need to<br>
implement the interface methods irrespective of its use in task?<br>
<br>
? <br>
<br>
? <br>
<br>
Thanks for all your input. <br>
? <br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Sharath.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: </tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090720/ee71ce1e/attachment-0001.htm">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090720/ee71ce1e/attachment-0001.htm</a></tt><tt><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:27:28 -0400<br>
From: David Trant <david_trant@hotmail.com><br>
Subject: RE: Issue with terminating event<br>
To: <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
Message-ID: <BLU109-W10878AB5BE08DB5546071C931D0@phx.gbl><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"<br>
<br>
<br>
I had a similar issue a fewl years ago -- I believe it was on 4.6C -- and SAP suggested putting in a wait step (wait for 20 seconds) after the "wait for" step. It had something to do with locking. In fact, I just checked and I still have some design notes on the delay step:<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
This work item executes a method in the background, ZDELAY20SECONDS, which invokes function module Z_DELAY20SECONDS which has a command to wait 20 seconds. This has been implemented per SAP?s instructions to avoid locking issues that were encountered in the original implementation. It is invoked after each ?wait for event? step in the workflow definition.<br>
<br>
<br>
Not sure if this is the same issue or not, but if so, give it a try.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Enjoy,<br>
<br>
David<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:25:10 +0400<br>
Subject: Issue with terminating event<br>
From: ikhansap@gmail.com<br>
To: SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi friends,<br>
we are having an issue in the custom Purchase order workflow. When the approver's releases the PO from his inbox, the workflow is not proceeding further and the work item remains in is inbox with status "In process" .I checked the table SWFDEVINST and there is an entry for this PO. I tried creating a terminating event directly from SWUE but in this case the workflow is moving to next step but the work item still lies in the approver's inbox and in workflow log that approval task is in status "In process". One weird thing in this workflow is there are both wait for event and the terminating event is used, it could be a problem but this issue is occuring very rarely. Please advice what could be the issue. I tried to complete the work item manually from tcode SWIA but the workflow went into error.<br>
_________________________________________________________________<br>
Windows Live? Hotmail?: Celebrate the moment with your favorite sports pics. Check it out.<br>
</tt><tt><a href="http://www.windowslive.com/Online/Hotmail/Campaign/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_QA_HM_sports_photos_072009&cat=sports">http://www.windowslive.com/Online/Hotmail/Campaign/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_QA_HM_sports_photos_072009&cat=sports</a></tt><tt><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: </tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090720/4ec4cb00/attachment-0001.htm">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090720/4ec4cb00/attachment-0001.htm</a></tt><tt><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:24:03 +1000<br>
From: Sandy <maorriyan.santoso@gmail.com><br>
Subject: Re: UWL configuration Wizard dropdowns in EP7<br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<16d26f720907202124k335535ban1b990078165254d9@mail.gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Hi Karl.<br>
Just in case you haven't resolve you issue,<br>
I was utilising UWL Wizard and have no issue with it. Make sure uwl property<br>
of sap_uwl_viewname has value DefaultView. No need to change this<br>
<br>
Second thing, make sure your xml code, uploaded with High priority.<br>
<br>
If you facing an error upon removing columns, please have a look OSS Note<br>
1259907<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Karl Nietz <knietz@csc.com.au> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I am attempting to use the UWL Wizard to hide columns in the UWL. The<br>
> wizard is showing no drop-downs and is thus unusable. We have previously<br>
> successfully implemented a copy of xml fragment uwl_standard as per page 21<br>
> of Darren Hagues's book to limit the number of tabs shown, using a<br>
> navigation node of 'zcustom' instead of 'Main'. The 'zcustom' node is<br>
> referenced in the delta-linked copy of the iview in the property<br>
> useNavigationId (the property sap_uwl_viewname remains as 'DefaultView').<br>
> Assume this is all ok as it works fine when the UWL is rendered.<br>
> However, the wizard now does not allow configuration (ie. no dropdowns<br>
> available etc). Is this because the navigation node in the fragment now<br>
> references 'zcustom'? A previous post metioned a similar problem and<br>
> suggested changing uwl files com.sap.pct.erp.mss.001 and<br>
> com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra. I tried a few changes with copies of these (and<br>
> cleared cache etc) but could not get a solution, although my xml skills<br>
> are not expert. Are these in any case the right xml files that require<br>
> change? I suspect this problem cannot be unique so can I ask for<br>
> suggestions as to what I need to do to resolve this. Thanks.<br>
> Karl Nietz<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
> </tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a></tt><tt><br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: </tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/ca62d753/attachment-0001.htm">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/ca62d753/attachment-0001.htm</a></tt><tt><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:44:16 +0200<br>
From: Nat 4 Govender <ngovender4@toyota.co.za><br>
Subject: Re: Question regarding creating a rule based on vendor<br>
responsibility<br>
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
Cc: "'sap-wug@mit.edu'" <sap-wug@mit.edu>, sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<OF576B2299.C6135BC9-ON422575FA.0019794B-422575FA.001998EF@toyota.co.za><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Hi Miguel,<br>
<br>
Check that in the rule that the from value and to value are the same.<br>
<br>
When you test the rule does it work?<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Nat Govender<br>
Toyota South Africa<br>
IT - SAP Workflow Specialist<br>
Internal Ext. : 32645<br>
Direct Line : +27 031 910 2645<br>
Fax : 086 607 0414<br>
E-mail : ngovender4@toyota.co.za<br>
<br>
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
"Viera, Miguel" <br>
<VieraM@dhcmc.com <br>
> To <br>
Sent by: "'sap-wug@mit.edu'" <br>
sap-wug-bounces@m <sap-wug@mit.edu> <br>
it.edu cc <br>
<br>
Subject <br>
20-07-2009 06:22 Question regarding creating a rule <br>
PM based on vendor responsibility <br>
<br>
<br>
Please respond to <br>
"SAP Workflow <br>
Users' Group" <br>
<sap-wug@mit.edu> <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Hello,<br>
<br>
I have a request from a user to create a rule based on vendor<br>
responsibility for a Price Block Workflow. The rule would assign the work<br>
item to the user responsible for the vendor that has a price block. I have<br>
created the rule in PFAC, set-up the container element Vendor (ABAP Dict.<br>
Reference: Structure ? LFA1 & Field ? LIFNR). In the responsibilities tab<br>
I have created different rules that have the applicable vendors which are<br>
each assigned to specific positions from the Org Plan.<br>
<br>
The problem I have when I test the workflow is that when there is a price<br>
block for a specific vendor, the workflow is showing it has been assigned<br>
to all the positions assigned to the various rules created. I would expect<br>
the assignment to only be to one position.<br>
<br>
Ex. Vendor 2 is assigned to Position 30000069 (Based on Responsibility Tab<br>
for Rule created)<br>
<br>
Another option I have would be to create a rule that looks directly at a<br>
non-standard reference table listing the SBL?s and Buyer 1?s responsible<br>
for their specific vendors. From a maintenance standpoint, if the<br>
assignment changed, the only thing needed to be updated is the<br>
non-standard table instead of also updating the rule. Any suggestions on<br>
how to possibly create this type of rule or recommended documentation on<br>
the internet you have found helpful in the past.<br>
<br>
Any insight would be greatly appreciated!<br>
<br>
Miguel R. Viera<br>
Deere-Hitachi C.M.C<br>
SAP Business Analyst for FI-CO & SD Modules<br>
Workflow Admin. & Winshuttle Template Designer<br>
Phone: (336) 992-5759<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
</tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a></tt><tt><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: </tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/cf9c4720/attachment.htm">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/cf9c4720/attachment.htm</a></tt><tt><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: graycol.gif<br>
Type: image/gif<br>
Size: 105 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : </tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/cf9c4720/graycol.gif">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/cf9c4720/graycol.gif</a></tt><tt><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: pic00041.gif<br>
Type: image/gif<br>
Size: 1255 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : </tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/cf9c4720/pic00041.gif">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/cf9c4720/pic00041.gif</a></tt><tt><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: ecblank.gif<br>
Type: image/gif<br>
Size: 45 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : </tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/cf9c4720/ecblank.gif">http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090721/cf9c4720/ecblank.gif</a></tt><tt><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
</tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a></tt><tt><br>
<br>
<br>
End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 56, Issue 39<br>
***************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
</tt><tt><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><br>
</body></html>