<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Use of substitution to classify tasks</TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18783"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Hi,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>I just want to make it clear that Alloy (IBM/SAP Lotus Notes
integration) substitution is supported according to the rules in the
backend.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>In fact, I just happened to mention substitution as an
important factor in decision-making in a blog on sdn
yesterday:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial><A
href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/15025">https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/15025</A></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>BTW: Comments very, very, very, gratefully received - not just
from Lotus Notes users.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Best regards,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Alan Rickayzen</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>SAP AG</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=862023413-15072009><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV><BR>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Mike
Pokraka<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday 15 July 2009 15:20<BR><B>To:</B> SAP Workflow
Users' Group<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: Use of substitution to classify
tasks<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: normal">Hi
Ginger,<BR><BR>Just to add to everyone's replies... <BR><BR>Substitution is a
must have. Classification can be critical but often isn't - and therefore they
aren't not always used since they add an additional layer of
complexity.<BR><BR>A typical use case is when a customer uses HR workflows
relating to sensitive info. A manager may want to delegate PO approvals
downwards, but not that approval item for a 50% pay rise.<BR><BR>Thus if any HR
scenarios such as extra payments or compensation adjustment make it into Duet
then clsssifications will be a must have.<BR><BR>Cheers,
<BR>Mike<BR><BR></SPAN><BR><BR>
<HR>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:
</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: normal">Gatling,
Ginger <ginger.gatling@sap.com></SPAN><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:
</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: normal">14 July 2009
14:37</SPAN><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To: </SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: normal">sap-wug@mit.edu</SPAN><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:
</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-WEIGHT: normal">Use of
substitution to classify tasks</SPAN><BR><BR>
<P><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Hello Everyone,</FONT><BR><FONT size=2
face=Arial>I have a colleague looking a future Duet functionality, and they are
wondering how much customers use substitution in general, and which ones use
classification of tasks. With tasks classification you can classify
your tasks, and then include them in a subsitution profile. This way
substitutes only get certain tasks.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2 face=Arial>I've told them that substitution is heavily used -but
I'm not sure about task classification. Would you mind letting me know how
much you use task classification? And, if you don't use the
substitution provided by workflow - do you use something else?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Thanks so much for your help!</FONT><BR><FONT size=2
face=Arial>Best</FONT><BR><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Ginger</FONT><BR><FONT size=2
face=Arial>(ginger.gatling@sap.com)</FONT></P></BODY></HTML>