<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Sharath,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You should refer to t.code SWNCONFIG.</DIV>
<DIV>Additional help can be found in the following URL.</DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/d5/581ee8d56f1247bf34cfcd66d16d81/frameset.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/d5/581ee8d56f1247bf34cfcd66d16d81/frameset.htm</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Good luck,<BR> </DIV>
<P><FONT face="verdana, helvetica, sans-serif" color=#00007f size=2><STRONG>Regards,<BR>Shai Eyal</STRONG></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana color=#000080 size=2><STRONG>SAP Logistics senior consultant<BR>SAP Workflow specialist<BR>Mobile: 972-52-5816633</STRONG></FONT></P>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif">----- Original Message ----<BR>From: "sap-wug-request@mit.edu" <sap-wug-request@mit.edu><BR>To: sap-wug@mit.edu<BR>Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:26:53<BR>Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 46, Issue 36<BR><BR>Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to<BR> <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR> <A href="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR> <A href="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu"
ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu">sap-wug-owner@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR> 1. RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the<BR> WF-BATCHuser (Mike Pokraka)<BR> 2. Re: RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background using<BR> the WF-BATCHuser (Florin Wach)<BR> 3. Re: Consolidated email (Sharath K)<BR> 4. RE: ABAP-OO Workflow Rule Resolution (Mike Gambier)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:25:59 +0100 (BST)<BR>From: "Mike Pokraka" <<A href="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com" ymailto="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com">wug@workflowconnections.com</A>><BR>Subject: RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background
using the<BR> WF-BATCHuser<BR>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>Message-ID:<BR> <<A href="mailto:48453.212.157.1.1.1221117959.squirrel@workflowconnections.com.mail.aaisp.net.uk" ymailto="mailto:48453.212.157.1.1.1221117959.squirrel@workflowconnections.com.mail.aaisp.net.uk">48453.212.157.1.1.1221117959.squirrel@workflowconnections.com.mail.aaisp.net.uk</A>><BR> <BR>Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1<BR><BR>Hi Margaret,<BR><BR>Yes, you assume correctly. The tRFC is the technical process by which the<BR>context switch is accomplished. Your userid creates the workitem (a side<BR>effect of advance with dialog) and then initiates a tRFC to start a new<BR>logon session for user WF-BATCH, which then executes the workitem.<BR><BR>In other words a tRFC will always appear where the processing
switches<BR>from dialog to background. If you skip the Check Approver step then the<BR>next background step will show a tRFC.<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR>Mike<BR><BR><BR>On Wed, September 10, 2008 10:13 pm, Schumacher, Margaret wrote:<BR>> Yes, I see the User Context and the "Processing Started" log entry has<BR>> my name and the entry is tRFC ... only the "Processing Complete" and<BR>> "Result Processing" show WF-BATCH. I can't see the trfc because it says<BR>> it already processed but would it have processed as me or WF-BATCH?<BR>> Do you think if I remove the Check Approver step and had it go directly<BR>> to the "Post parked doc" it would also have the tRFC object?<BR>><BR>><BR>> No time to test it today. Thanks for the feedback.<BR>><BR>><BR>> Regards<BR>><BR>> Margaret Schumacher<BR>><BR>><BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: Mike Pokraka [mailto:<A
href="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com" ymailto="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com">wug@workflowconnections.com</A>]<BR>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:08 PM<BR>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>> Subject: RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the<BR>> WF-BATCHuser<BR>><BR>> Hi Margaret,<BR>><BR>> When you say:<BR>> "I might be way off base but I seem to recall that immediate processing<BR>> of the next step might cary over the prior user's id."<BR>> you are only slightly off target.<BR>><BR>> Scroll all the way to the right of the log and you'll see a column 'User<BR>> Context'. This is new as of 620 or thereabouts and will show you the<BR>> userid the transaction is working under.<BR>><BR>> To put it simply, if the next task is dialog it will be *created* under<BR>> your user (but placed in the next recipient's inbox); if it's background<BR>> it will show the log as
you pointed out but the context will be<BR>> WF-BATCH.<BR>><BR>> Cheers,<BR>> Mike<BR>><BR>><BR>> On Wed, September 10, 2008 4:29 pm, Schumacher, Margaret wrote:<BR>>> Could it be that after the Approval the next step is the background<BR>>> post which you think is executed by WF-BATCh but really starts with<BR>>> the User Id of the prior step? I have a step between the approval and<BR>>> the post that verifies the approver has auth to approve since it might<BR>>> have been forwarded or substituted. Notice that step 164 has my name<BR>>> on the processing started log entry. I might be way off base but I<BR>>> seem to recall that immediate processing of the next step might cary<BR>> over the<BR>>> prior user's id. Please tell me if I'm wrong just seem to recall<BR>>> this might be the
case.....<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> Regards<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> Margaret Schumacher<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> ________________________________<BR>>><BR>>> From: Ibrahim Khan [mailto:<A href="mailto:ikhansap@gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:ikhansap@gmail.com">ikhansap@gmail.com</A>]<BR>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 5:42 AM<BR>>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>>> Subject: Re: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the<BR>>> WF-BATCHuser<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> Hi Paul,<BR>>> I check the Authorization check trace in ST01, everything is fine.<BR>>> Still can't figure our what could be the issue. I hope authorization<BR>>> should not be and issue since WF-BATCH have an SAP_ALL authorization.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:51 PM, <<A
href="mailto:Paul.Bakker@osr.treasury.qld.gov.au" ymailto="mailto:Paul.Bakker@osr.treasury.qld.gov.au">Paul.Bakker@osr.treasury.qld.gov.au</A>><BR>>> wrote:<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> Ibrahim,<BR>>><BR>>> Have you tried an authorization trace (via ST01) to verify that<BR>>> WF-BATCH is<BR>>> actually posting the invoice?<BR>>><BR>>> cheers<BR>>> Paul<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> "Ibrahim Khan"<BR>>> <<A href="mailto:ikhansap@gmail.c" ymailto="mailto:ikhansap@gmail.c">ikhansap@gmail.c</A><BR>>> om><BR>>> To<BR>>>
Sent by: "SAP Workflow Users'<BR>>> Group"<BR>>> sap-wug-bounces@m <<A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>><BR>>> it.edu<BR>>> cc<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> Subject<BR>>> 10/09/2008 04:24 Issue while posting the<BR>>> invoice in<BR>>> PM background using the<BR>>> WF-BATCH user<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
Please respond to<BR>>> "SAP Workflow<BR>>> Users' Group"<BR>>> <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> Hi Friends,<BR>>> I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background<BR>> using<BR>>> the<BR>>> WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in<BR>> when<BR>>> the<BR>>> approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted<BR>> using<BR>>> a<BR>>> background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST
and i am<BR>>> returning<BR>>> the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When<BR>> i<BR>>> see the<BR>>> log an exception is rasied from this method with an error<BR>> message<BR>>> "V004:<BR>>> You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is<BR>>> having<BR>>> SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice<BR>>> using the<BR>>> method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the<BR>> issue.<BR>>> Please advice.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>>> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>>>
<A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> **********************************************************************<BR>>> **<BR>>> **********************************************************************<BR>>> **<BR>>> ******<BR>>><BR>>> Only an individual or entity who is intended to be a recipient<BR>> of<BR>>> this e-mail may access or use the information contained in this e-mail<BR>>> or any of its attachments. Opinions contained in this e-mail or any<BR>>> of its attachments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of<BR>>> Queensland Treasury.<BR>>><BR>>> The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential<BR>> and<BR>>> may be legally privileged and the
subject of copyright. If you have<BR>>> received this e-mail in error, please notify Queensland Treasury<BR>>> immediately and erase all copies of the e-mail and the attachments.<BR>>> Queensland Treasury uses virus scanning software. However, it is not<BR>>> liable for viruses present in this e-mail or in any attachment.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> **********************************************************************<BR>>> **<BR>>> **********************************************************************<BR>>> **<BR>>> ******<BR>>><BR>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>>> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>>> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug"
target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>>> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>>> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:43:45 +0200<BR>From: "Florin Wach" <<A
href="mailto:florin.wach@gmx.net" ymailto="mailto:florin.wach@gmx.net">florin.wach@gmx.net</A>><BR>Subject: Re: RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background using<BR> the WF-BATCHuser<BR>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:20080911074345.183370@gmx.net" ymailto="mailto:20080911074345.183370@gmx.net">20080911074345.183370@gmx.net</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR><BR>Hi Margaret,<BR><BR>you also may create a new object method, e.g. FIPP.PostDialog and mark this as "synchronous, dialog" with the coding of<BR> swc_call_method self 'POST' container.<BR> IF sy-subrc ...<BR> "Handel exception 1001 and 1002 here and pass on<BR><BR>This way (after removing that step in-between that changes the user-ID to WF-BATCH) that task will be
executing with the current user-id, but you have to take more care about the workflow-pattern, as the user might struggle with such a work item in his inbox, if there was an exception on the POST-Method.<BR><BR>Best wishes,<BR>Florin<BR><BR>-------- Original-Nachricht --------<BR>> Datum: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:25:59 +0100 (BST)<BR>> Von: "Mike Pokraka" <<A href="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com" ymailto="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com">wug@workflowconnections.com</A>><BR>> An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>> Betreff: RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCHuser<BR><BR>> Hi Margaret,<BR>> <BR>> Yes, you assume correctly. The tRFC is the technical process by which the<BR>> context switch is accomplished. Your userid creates the workitem (a side<BR>> effect of advance with
dialog) and then initiates a tRFC to start a new<BR>> logon session for user WF-BATCH, which then executes the workitem.<BR>> <BR>> In other words a tRFC will always appear where the processing switches<BR>> from dialog to background. If you skip the Check Approver step then the<BR>> next background step will show a tRFC.<BR>> <BR>> Cheers,<BR>> Mike<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> On Wed, September 10, 2008 10:13 pm, Schumacher, Margaret wrote:<BR>> > Yes, I see the User Context and the "Processing Started" log entry has<BR>> > my name and the entry is tRFC ... only the "Processing Complete" and<BR>> > "Result Processing" show WF-BATCH. I can't see the trfc because it says<BR>> > it already processed but would it have processed as me or WF-BATCH?<BR>> > Do you think if I remove the Check Approver step and had it go directly<BR>> > to the "Post parked doc" it would also have the tRFC
object?<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > No time to test it today. Thanks for the feedback.<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > Regards<BR>> ><BR>> > Margaret Schumacher<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > From: Mike Pokraka [mailto:<A href="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com" ymailto="mailto:wug@workflowconnections.com">wug@workflowconnections.com</A>]<BR>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:08 PM<BR>> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>> > Subject: RE: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the<BR>> > WF-BATCHuser<BR>> ><BR>> > Hi Margaret,<BR>> ><BR>> > When you say:<BR>> > "I might be way off base but I seem to recall that immediate processing<BR>> > of the next step might cary over the prior user's id."<BR>> > you are only slightly off target.<BR>> ><BR>> > Scroll all the way to the
right of the log and you'll see a column 'User<BR>> > Context'. This is new as of 620 or thereabouts and will show you the<BR>> > userid the transaction is working under.<BR>> ><BR>> > To put it simply, if the next task is dialog it will be *created* under<BR>> > your user (but placed in the next recipient's inbox); if it's background<BR>> > it will show the log as you pointed out but the context will be<BR>> > WF-BATCH.<BR>> ><BR>> > Cheers,<BR>> > Mike<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > On Wed, September 10, 2008 4:29 pm, Schumacher, Margaret wrote:<BR>> >> Could it be that after the Approval the next step is the background<BR>> >> post which you think is executed by WF-BATCh but really starts with<BR>> >> the User Id of the prior step? I have a step between the approval and<BR>> >> the post that verifies the approver has auth to approve since it
might<BR>> >> have been forwarded or substituted. Notice that step 164 has my name<BR>> >> on the processing started log entry. I might be way off base but I<BR>> >> seem to recall that immediate processing of the next step might cary<BR>> > over the<BR>> >> prior user's id. Please tell me if I'm wrong just seem to recall<BR>> >> this might be the case.....<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> Regards<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> Margaret Schumacher<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> ________________________________<BR>> >><BR>> >> From: Ibrahim Khan [mailto:<A href="mailto:ikhansap@gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:ikhansap@gmail.com">ikhansap@gmail.com</A>]<BR>> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 5:42 AM<BR>>
>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>> >> Subject: Re: Issue while posting the invoice in background using the<BR>> >> WF-BATCHuser<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> Hi Paul,<BR>> >> I check the Authorization check trace in ST01, everything is fine.<BR>> >> Still can't figure our what could be the issue. I hope authorization<BR>> >> should not be and issue since WF-BATCH have an SAP_ALL authorization.<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:51 PM, <<A href="mailto:Paul.Bakker@osr.treasury.qld.gov.au" ymailto="mailto:Paul.Bakker@osr.treasury.qld.gov.au">Paul.Bakker@osr.treasury.qld.gov.au</A>><BR>> >> wrote:<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> Ibrahim,<BR>> >><BR>> >> Have you tried an authorization trace (via ST01) to verify that<BR>> >> WF-BATCH
is<BR>> >> actually posting the invoice?<BR>> >><BR>> >> cheers<BR>> >> Paul<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> "Ibrahim Khan"<BR>> >> <<A href="mailto:ikhansap@gmail.c" ymailto="mailto:ikhansap@gmail.c">ikhansap@gmail.c</A><BR>> >> om><BR>> >> To<BR>> >> Sent by: "SAP Workflow Users'<BR>> >> Group"<BR>> >> sap-wug-bounces@m <<A
href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>><BR>> >> it.edu<BR>> >> cc<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> Subject<BR>> >> 10/09/2008 04:24 Issue while posting the<BR>> >> invoice in<BR>> >> PM background using the<BR>> >> WF-BATCH user<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> Please respond to<BR>> >> "SAP Workflow<BR>> >>
Users' Group"<BR>> >> <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> Hi Friends,<BR>> >> I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background<BR>> > using<BR>> >> the<BR>> >> WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in<BR>> > when<BR>> >> the<BR>> >> approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted<BR>> > using<BR>> >> a<BR>> >> background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am<BR>> >> returning<BR>> >> the Message Text to my
workflow container from this method. When<BR>> > i<BR>> >> see the<BR>> >> log an exception is rasied from this method with an error<BR>> > message<BR>> >> "V004:<BR>> >> You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is<BR>> >> having<BR>> >> SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice<BR>> >> using the<BR>> >> method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the<BR>> > issue.<BR>> >> Please advice.<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> _______________________________________________<BR>> >> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> >> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>>
>> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> **********************************************************************<BR>> >> **<BR>> >> **********************************************************************<BR>> >> **<BR>> >> ******<BR>> >><BR>> >> Only an individual or entity who is intended to be a recipient<BR>> > of<BR>> >> this e-mail may access or use the information contained in this e-mail<BR>> >> or any of its attachments. Opinions contained in this e-mail or any<BR>> >> of its attachments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of<BR>> >> Queensland Treasury.<BR>> >><BR>> >> The contents of this
e-mail and any attachments are confidential<BR>> > and<BR>> >> may be legally privileged and the subject of copyright. If you have<BR>> >> received this e-mail in error, please notify Queensland Treasury<BR>> >> immediately and erase all copies of the e-mail and the attachments.<BR>> >> Queensland Treasury uses virus scanning software. However, it is not<BR>> >> liable for viruses present in this e-mail or in any attachment.<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> **********************************************************************<BR>> >> **<BR>> >> **********************************************************************<BR>> >> **<BR>> >> ******<BR>> >><BR>> >> _______________________________________________<BR>> >> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> >> <A
href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>> >> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> _______________________________________________<BR>> >> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> >> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>> >> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>> >><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > _______________________________________________<BR>> > SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> > <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>> > <A
href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>> ><BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR>> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 3<BR>Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:51:41 -0700 (PDT)<BR>From: Sharath K <<A href="mailto:ksharath77@yahoo.com" ymailto="mailto:ksharath77@yahoo.com">ksharath77@yahoo.com</A>><BR>Subject: Re: Consolidated email<BR>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:487547.70424.qm@web39708.mail.mud.yahoo.com"
ymailto="mailto:487547.70424.qm@web39708.mail.mud.yahoo.com">487547.70424.qm@web39708.mail.mud.yahoo.com</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Hi Shay,<BR>could you please give me some more info on 'Extended Notifications for SAP Business Workflow?'..is this same what we see in?workflow task as separate tab..<BR>How this will send single email?for more then 1 work items..till now I am thinking this will send separate email for each work item...could you please give me some details..<BR><BR><BR>thanks...<BR><BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message ----<BR>From: Shai Eyal <<A href="mailto:shai.eyal@yahoo.com" ymailto="mailto:shai.eyal@yahoo.com">shai.eyal@yahoo.com</A>><BR>To: <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A><BR>Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:47:04 AM<BR>Subject: Re: Consolidated email<BR><BR><BR>Sharath <BR><BR>In case you're using extended notification (which I
personally recommend) you can do it via the category definitions for collective message.<BR><BR>If you're using RSWUWFML2 you have set the granularity for collective message but it is collective per recipient and not per task. You can "play" with variants but that's not elegant. In addition, in this case RSWUWFML2 does not provide?links.<BR><BR>Good luck,<BR><BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Shai Eyal<BR>SAP Logistics senior consultant<BR>SAP Workflow specialist<BR>Mobile: 972-52-5816633<BR><BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:05:36 -0700 (PDT)<BR>From: Sharath K <<A href="mailto:ksharath77@yahoo.com" ymailto="mailto:ksharath77@yahoo.com">ksharath77@yahoo.com</A>><BR>Subject: Consolidated email<BR>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:374216.57157.qm@web39702.mail.mud.yahoo.com"
ymailto="mailto:374216.57157.qm@web39702.mail.mud.yahoo.com">374216.57157.qm@web39702.mail.mud.yahoo.com</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR><BR>Hi All,<BR>I have a workflow which sends an outlook email approval/rejection. Is it possible to send a single email to the user if he is involved in multiple instances..<BR><BR>thanks,<BR>Sharath<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>________________________________<BR>Get your preferred Email name! <BR>Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com.<BR><BR><BR> <BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080911/3bf02742/attachment-0001.htm" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080911/3bf02742/attachment-0001.htm</A><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 4<BR>Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:26:16 +0000<BR>From: Mike Gambier <<A
href="mailto:madgambler@hotmail.com" ymailto="mailto:madgambler@hotmail.com">madgambler@hotmail.com</A>><BR>Subject: RE: ABAP-OO Workflow Rule Resolution<BR>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:BAY117-W1103AC87B9F6B441C8E63BD5560@phx.gbl" ymailto="mailto:BAY117-W1103AC87B9F6B441C8E63BD5560@phx.gbl">BAY117-W1103AC87B9F6B441C8E63BD5560@phx.gbl</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR><BR>Florin,<BR><BR>That's precisely my point. I think SAP have missed a trick here in relying on the old SWCONT container construct everywhere. The fact that they haven't touched their old FMs is probably more to do with backwards compatibility rather than backwards thinking I'm sure. But frankly I'm staggered that they haven't extended their containers to offer a construct that can actually cope with class instances as well as
BOR object instances and flat elements all in one place.<BR><BR>The only problem with ABAP_PARMBIND that trips a lot of poeple up is the local definition of types and data variables that end up being freed in the call stack thereby invalidating the container entries. But, apart from this limitation they are extremely verstaile.<BR><BR>Surely ABAP_PARMBIND lends itself to the 'new' ABAP-OO Workflow engine? To my mind they were made for each other.<BR><BR>Mike GT> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:00:13 +0200> From: <A href="mailto:florin.wach@gmx.net" ymailto="mailto:florin.wach@gmx.net">florin.wach@gmx.net</A>> Subject: Re: RE: ABAP-OO Workflow Rule Resolution> To: <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>> > ...because it isn't passed to the function module of the rule resolution> (see function module RH_GET_ACTORS lines 158ff)> * execute function to resolve actor without evaluation path>
> CALL FUNCTION exec_fname> TABLES> ac_container = actor_container> actor_tab = actor_tab> EXCEPTIONS> OTHERS = 1.> > > > -------- Original-Nachricht --------> > Datum: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:51:40 +0000> > Von: Mike Gambier <<A href="mailto:madgambler@hotmail.com" ymailto="mailto:madgambler@hotmail.com">madgambler@hotmail.com</A>>> > An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>>> > Betreff: RE: ABAP-OO Workflow Rule Resolution> > > > > Florin,> > > > Any reason why a container based on ABAP_PARMBIND_TAB couldn't be used> > here instead?> > > > Mike GT> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:14:52 +0200> From: <A href="mailto:florin.wach@gmx.net" ymailto="mailto:florin.wach@gmx.net">florin.wach@gmx.net</A>>> > Subject: ABAP-OO Workflow Rule Resolution> To: <A
href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>> > Hi> > Wuggies,> > I have just stumbled over!<BR> an issue with the rule resolution by> > "function module" using ABAP-OO, as the container is not passed as a reference> > to IF_SWF_CNT_CONTAINER nor as a persistent XML-reference (as the check and> > receiver function modules do). So there's currently a small GAP.> > > The> > requirement was, to pass the persistent object reference (structure> > SIBFLPOR) and/or the object instance (TYPE REF TO ---type---) to the role-container> > (AC_CONTAINER).> > The straightforward(?) solution was:> - Create a> > container element "LPOR" with struct-reference to type SIBFLPOR> - Create a> > public attribute MS_LPOR and assign this in the binding to the rule> > (Releasable->MS_LPOR --> LPOR)> > A little bit of a suprise was,
that the binding> > checks returns with an error, saying that that assignment is just incompatible.> > That was true in the way, that the instance-attribute MS_LPOR was treated> > as it was a TYPE-REF-TO definition. So the only eligible target type for the> > bindi!<BR>ng was a TYPE-REF-TO definition.> > However. I have changed the> > con<BR>tainer stuff and now having a new element RELEASALBE with a TYPE-REF-TO> > definition and within the dataflow I just pass the _wi_object_id itself. Now the> > binding checks is fine.> > On runtime now, the following coding will /not/> > work, to retrieve the object instance:> > DATA: releasable TYPE REF TO> > Z_CL_RELEASABLE.> swc_get_element ac_container 'Releasable' releasable.> >> > Because the "new" ABAP-OO elements are passed in a way, that the old> > BOR-container macros cannot work with.> > On the other hand,
the rule interface does> > not (!) provide the ac_container as an object referring to> > IF_SWF_CNT_CONTAINER (or something like this).> > So this is, how it works:> > Create a> > new import parameter (optional, pass-value) for future use:>> > ACTOR_CONTAINER_OO TYPE REF TO IF_SWF_CNT_CONTAINER Container: Implementing Class> > > "...> > further in coding> > * The ABAP-OO container object is currently not> > designed by SAP. This> * part is not yet fully compatibl!<BR>e to the new> > ABAP-OO-Workflow.> * Therefore we will help ourself here and create it backwards from>> > * the BOR-container.> * If the interface is correctly(!) used in the> > future, then we will> * also use, what the standard gives us.> IF> > actor_container_oo IS INITIAL.> CALL METHOD> > CL_SWF_CNT_CONTAINER=>IF_SWF_CNT_CONVERSION~CREATE_FROM_BOR_CONTAINER>
EXPORTING> values = ac_container[]> RECEIVING>> > container = actor_container_oo.> ENDIF.> > DATA: releasable_oo TYPE REF TO> > Z_CL_RELEASABLE.> swf_get_element actor_container_oo 'Releasable'> > lo_releasable.> "no it's fine :-)> IF NOT sy-subrc EQ 0.> "Handle exceptions here>> > ENDIF.> > > > Take care,> Florin>> > _______________________________________________> SAP-WUG mailing list> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>>> > <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>> > _________________________________________________________________> > Make a mini you and download it into Windows Live Messenger> > <A href="http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/1"
target=_blank>http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/1</A>!<BR>11354029/direct/01/> _______________________________________________> <BR>SAP-WUG mailing list> <A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>_________________________________________________________________<BR>Make a mini you and download it into Windows Live Messenger<BR><A href="http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354029/direct/01/" target=_blank>http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354029/direct/01/</A><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080911/34ea4ed9/attachment.htm"
target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080911/34ea4ed9/attachment.htm</A><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR><A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR><BR><BR>End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 46, Issue 36<BR>***************************************<BR></DIV></DIV></div><br>
<hr size=1> <a href="http://sg.rd.yahoo.com/aa/mail/domainchoice/mail/signature/*http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/"> Get your preferred Email name! </a> <br>
Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com.</body></html>