<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks again for your fast response
& info.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Should I be using 00000038 or 20000077?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">John<br>
<br>
CSC Computer Sciences Limited<br>
Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
GU11 1PZ, UK<br>
Registered in England No: 0963578<br>
<br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. <br>
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.<br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Florin Wach"
<florin.wach@gmx.net></b> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">23/04/2008 10:43</font>
<table border>
<tr valign=top>
<td bgcolor=white>
<div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu></font></div></table>
<br>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"SAP Workflow Users' Group"
<sap-wug@mit.edu></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: Pur req-release wrkflw</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>Jup,<br>
<br>
this seems to be not working a 100% as designed.<br>
<br>
I usually deselect the SignificantlyChanged event as the terminating event
in the workflow pattern (as a copy from the SAP's original), as that event
is always accompanied by the .Rejection_start.<br>
<br>
Also the (newer?) template WS20000077 has the same thing.<br>
<br>
If you'd like to avoid that, you could also use a check-function module
in the instance coupling of the task TS20000159 that avoids the event .SignificantlyChanged
of beeing processed. Or you'd add a info-rejection as the first step in
the rejection flow.<br>
<br>
Best wishes,<br>
Florin<br>
<br>
<br>
-------- Original-Nachricht --------<br>
> Datum: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:22:54 +0100<br>
> Von: John A Haworth <jhoworth@csc.com><br>
> An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
> Betreff: Pur req-release wrkflw<br>
<br>
> Thanks for that info.<br>
> <br>
> Continuing on the same workflow. I have an issue with the way this
seems <br>
> to be working, could someone please comment?<br>
> <br>
> It seems that when the Pur Req is created and saved, WS0000038 is
<br>
> triggered ok, and the approve request is sent to the correct Responsible
<br>
> Agent. If that agent then Approves the PReq, the workflow works correctly
<br>
> and the initiator is informed via a wflw task from WS0000038. But
if the <br>
> agents rejects the Preq, then event 'SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED' is raised
which<br>
> cancels down the initial workflow (WS0000038), together with a second
<br>
> event REJECTION_START which then triggers a new single
step workflow <br>
> (WS65400027)<br>
> <br>
> This doesnt look correct, as cancelling down the initial workflow,
means <br>
> that the task 'Negative Confirmation' in WS0000038 doesnt get touched
and <br>
> therefore isnt sent to the initiator (whereas the positive confirmation
<br>
> task is run when the Agent approves)<br>
> <br>
> WS65400027 then waits for the event REJECTION_STOP as a terminating
event,<br>
> but the initiator is never informed.<br>
> <br>
> Many Thanks<br>
> <br>
> John<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> CSC Computer Sciences Limited<br>
> Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
<br>
> GU11 1PZ, UK<br>
> Registered in England No: 0963578<br>
> <br>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
please <br>
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake
in <br>
> delivery. <br>
> NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind
CSC to <br>
> any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
<br>
> or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for
such <br>
> purpose.<br>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> "Florin Wach (gmx)" <florin.wach@gmx.net> <br>
> Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu<br>
> 21/04/2008 17:39<br>
> Please respond to<br>
> "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> To<br>
> "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><br>
> cc<br>
> <br>
> Subject<br>
> Re: user exit on Pur req-release wrkflw<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Hi John,<br>
> <br>
> if the box "Assigned agent" is left blank, der Task's standard
role <br>
> resolution is used, which is, what's exactly happening there.<br>
> <br>
> Look at the Task definition of TS... under "Rules".<br>
> <br>
> Best wishes,<br>
> Florin<br>
> ----- Original Message ----- <br>
> From: John A Haworth <br>
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <br>
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 4:49 PM<br>
> Subject: user exit on Pur req-release wrkflw<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Hi <br>
> <br>
> I am looking at a clients already created workflows. One is the purchase
<br>
> requisition release standard workflow WS00000038. They have the purchase
<br>
> reqs configured to use the LXM06U12 Customer enhancement to look in
a <br>
> customer table for the approver name, that all looks ok. <br>
> But the first step in the workflow that sends the approval request
to the <br>
> approver, has no entry in the 'Responsible Agents' entry box. Yet
the <br>
> workflow seems to be sending to the right person?? Surely this is
not <br>
> right, and my mental block thats happening more frequently is not
helping!<br>
> Any advice? <br>
> <br>
> John<br>
> <br>
> CSC Computer Sciences Limited<br>
> Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
<br>
> GU11 1PZ, UK<br>
> Registered in England No: 0963578<br>
> <br>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
please <br>
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake
in <br>
> delivery. <br>
> NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind
CSC to <br>
> any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
<br>
> or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for
such <br>
> purpose.<br>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
> <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
</tt></font>
<br>