<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks for that info.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Continuing on the same workflow. I have
an issue with the way this seems to be working, could someone please comment?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">It seems that when the Pur Req is created
and saved, WS0000038 is triggered ok, and the approve request is sent to
the correct Responsible Agent. If that agent then Approves the PReq, the
workflow works correctly and the initiator is informed via a wflw task
from WS0000038. But if the agents rejects the Preq, then event 'SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED'
is raised which cancels down the initial workflow (WS0000038), together
with a second event REJECTION_START which then triggers a
new single step workflow (WS65400027)</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">This doesnt look correct, as cancelling
down the initial workflow, means that the task 'Negative Confirmation'
in WS0000038 doesnt get touched and therefore isnt sent to the initiator
(whereas the positive confirmation task is run when the Agent approves)</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">WS65400027 then waits for the event
REJECTION_STOP as a terminating event, but the initiator is never informed.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Many Thanks</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">John</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
<br>
CSC Computer Sciences Limited<br>
Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
GU11 1PZ, UK<br>
Registered in England No: 0963578<br>
<br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. <br>
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.<br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Florin Wach (gmx)"
<florin.wach@gmx.net></b> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">21/04/2008 17:39</font>
<table border>
<tr valign=top>
<td bgcolor=white>
<div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu></font></div></table>
<br>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"SAP Workflow Users' Group"
<sap-wug@mit.edu></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: user exit on Pur req-release wrkflw</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">Hi John,</font>
<br><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">if the box "Assigned agent" is
left blank, der Task's standard role resolution is used, which is, what's
exactly happening there.</font>
<br><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">Look at the Task definition of TS... under
"Rules".</font>
<br><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">Best wishes,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">Florin</font>
<br><font size=3>----- Original Message ----- </font>
<br><font size=3><b>From:</b> </font><a href=mailto:jhoworth@csc.com><font size=3 color=blue><u>John
A Haworth</u></font></a><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=3><b>To:</b> </font><a href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu"><font size=3 color=blue><u>SAP
Workflow Users' Group</u></font></a><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=3><b>Sent:</b> Monday, April 21, 2008 4:49 PM</font>
<br><font size=3><b>Subject:</b> user exit on Pur req-release wrkflw</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Hi</font><font size=3> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
I am looking at a clients already created workflows. One is the purchase
requisition release standard workflow WS00000038. They have the purchase
reqs configured to use the LXM06U12 Customer enhancement to look in a customer
table for the approver name, that all looks ok.</font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
But the first step in the workflow that sends the approval request to the
approver, has no entry in the 'Responsible Agents' entry box. Yet the workflow
seems to be sending to the right person?? Surely this is not right, and
my mental block thats happening more frequently is not helping! Any advice?</font><font size=3>
<br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
John<br>
<br>
CSC Computer Sciences Limited<br>
Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
GU11 1PZ, UK<br>
Registered in England No: 0963578<br>
<br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. <br>
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.<br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</font>
<p>
<hr>
<p><font size=3>_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</font><font size=2><tt>_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
</tt></font>
<p>