<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: SAP Workflow Version</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2995" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText92709 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>I know that this is mostly an academic argument but I would love to hear peoples thoughts on this...</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>You know what I hate? I hate it when I look at a Z Business Object (delegated sub-type) and someone has created a method called zUpdate or an attribute called zAmount. Is there really a need for the 'z' in the name of the attribute/method? Perhaps there is something I am missing here so please feel free to point out the error of my ways. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>Do people do this because they don't realise that they can redefine an SAP delivered attribute/method? Or are they concerned that SAP will deliver an attribute with the exact same name? I assume that the redefined method/attribute would not be effected but perhaps someone has had this happen...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>I understand why people do it with append fields on a table but why do this for a BOR sub-type?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>Alon</FONT></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>