<html>
<head>
<style>
P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=930 border=0 >
<TBODY >
<TR >
<TD ><FONT face="Tms Rmn" >
<P>Hi All, <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
We are using the standard Badi workflow WS14000134 & WS14000133 with<BR>
the standard decision task TS10008126 ( general task)<BR>
<BR>
The preview is working on our Development system and not on the quality<BR>
system. I have checked the task, Business object, rule to determine<BR>
the agent and the BADI all are set up in the same way<BR>
<BR>
The message that we have on the preview is the following:<BR>
"Approval step without ad-hoc capability. No preview possible"<BR>
<BR>
The agent determination is <FONT class="">done in the business object . <FONT class="">When the shopping cart is on hold or saved I can see that the approvers are calculated correctly. </FONT> </FONT><BR>
The <FONT class="">workflow runs perfectly well, but only the preview is causing us problem</FONT><BR>
Can you help me if you have any idea of the possible origin of this problem ?<BR>
Technical information:<BR>
SAPKA64016 Cross-Application Component<BR>
SAPKB64016 SAP Basis Component<BR>
SAPKIPYJ64 Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) 2005_1_640<BR>
SAPKITLPS1 SAP Solution Tools Plug-In (ST-PI 003C_6<BR>
SAPKW35014 Business Information Warehouse<BR>
SAPKIBKS08 SRM_SERVER<BR>
SAPK-26404INCCM CCM 200_640 : Add-On Delta Upgrade<BR></FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><FONT face="Tms Rmn" ></P>
<BR></FONT>
<BR ><FONT class="">Many Thanks</FONT> <BR >Stephane<BR ><BR ><BR ><BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
<BR>
> From: sap-wug-request@mit.edu<BR>> Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 19, Issue 70<BR>> To: sap-wug@mit.edu<BR>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:43:25 -0400<BR>> <BR>> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to<BR>> sap-wug@mit.edu<BR>> <BR>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>> sap-wug-request@mit.edu<BR>> <BR>> You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>> sap-wug-owner@mit.edu<BR>> <BR>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Today's Topics:<BR>> <BR>> 1. RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry (Dart, Jocelyn)<BR>> 2. RE: Validation of selected substitutes ? (Dart, Jocelyn)<BR>> 3. EBP Worflow Trigger issue with multiple lines in SC (D Duchon)<BR>> 4. RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry (jerry.martinek)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> Message: 1<BR>> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:30:12 +0800<BR>> From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart@sap.com><BR>> Subject: RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry<BR>> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu><BR>> Message-ID:<BR>> <F843AF000027394A9F3D3194109269F45E15A7@sgsine11.sin.sap.corp><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR>> <BR>> Jerry, <BR>> Again this is possible and relatively uncomplicated to do from Extended<BR>> Notifications. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Regards, <BR>> Jocelyn Dart <BR>> Senior Consultant <BR>> SAP Australia Pty Ltd. <BR>> Level 1/168 Walker St. <BR>> North Sydney <BR>> NSW, 2060 <BR>> Australia <BR>> T +61 412 390 267 <BR>> M + 61 412 390 267 <BR>> E jocelyn.dart@sap.com <BR>> http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/> <BR>> <BR>> The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission<BR>> is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for<BR>> the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the<BR>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution,<BR>> copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this<BR>> electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly<BR>> prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,<BR>> please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the<BR>> original documents. <BR>> <BR>> Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and<BR>> accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data<BR>> corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the<BR>> consequences thereof.<BR>> <BR>> Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the<BR>> individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the<BR>> sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of<BR>> its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,<BR>> officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability<BR>> for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained<BR>> herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/<BR>> business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and<BR>> shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding<BR>> agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into<BR>> any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ________________________________<BR>> <BR>> From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf<BR>> Of jerry.martinek<BR>> Sent: Monday, 26 June 2006 4:09 AM<BR>> To: 'SAP Workflow Users' Group'<BR>> Subject: RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Hi Mark,<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> That's what I was afraid of. What I want is a generic, common notice and<BR>> not a task description informing the approver that they have a<BR>> pending/waiting request in their UWL. Sort of similar to the UWL based<BR>> substitutions. I don't want to have multiple instance of this job, one<BR>> per SAP system. Furthermore what I need is an URL in the email that<BR>> takes them to the UWL folder directly from Outlook.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Thanks for the confirmation.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> <BR>> Jerry<BR>> <BR>> ________________________________<BR>> <BR>> From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf<BR>> Of Mark Pyc<BR>> Sent: June 25, 2006 12:47 AM<BR>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>> Subject: Re: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> G'day Jerry,<BR>> <BR>> I can appreciate that what you're after is an UWL equivalent of<BR>> RSWUWFML2. i.e. like the UWL it would be central and only configured<BR>> once rather than in each backend system, but I don't think such<BR>> functionality exists. I think you just have to set up RSWUWFML2 in each<BR>> system. <BR>> <BR>> Have fun,<BR>> Mark<BR>> <BR>> On 6/25/06, jerry.martinek <jerry.martinek@shawbiz.ca> wrote:<BR>> <BR>> Hi All,<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Is it possible to setup an UWL triggered email notification process if<BR>> the owner receives a workitem in their UWL? It's sort of the opposite<BR>> functionality of the UWL Alerts. The goal is to let the selected person<BR>> know that they have a waiting approval request in their UWL inbox.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> I've read through the documentation on the UWL but I couldn't find<BR>> anything on this subject.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Thanks,<BR>> <BR>> Jerry<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -------------- next part --------------<BR>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060628/b783a462/attachment-0001.htm<BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> Message: 2<BR>> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:34:25 +0800<BR>> From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart@sap.com><BR>> Subject: RE: Validation of selected substitutes ?<BR>> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@MIT.EDU><BR>> Message-ID:<BR>> <F843AF000027394A9F3D3194109269F45E15A9@sgsine11.sin.sap.corp><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR>> <BR>> Sue, <BR>> <BR>> Yes we have asked for BADIs but no official word yet on when or whether<BR>> they will be introduced. However if you are using the UWL with SRM<BR>> (which you are I seem to remember?)<BR>> - a mod in the relevant SAP_WAPI_SUBSTITUTE_CREATE function module will<BR>> do it. I've done this before at another project ... this is where we've<BR>> asked for the user-exit to be placed. You'll still have to put<BR>> together your own logic for deciding what is an attribute match. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> Jocelyn Dart<BR>> Senior Consultant<BR>> SAP Australia Pty Ltd.<BR>> Level 1/168 Walker St.<BR>> North Sydney <BR>> NSW, 2060<BR>> Australia<BR>> T +61 412 390 267<BR>> M + 61 412 390 267<BR>> E jocelyn.dart@sap.com<BR>> http://www.sap.com<BR>> <BR>> The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission<BR>> is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for<BR>> the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the<BR>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution,<BR>> copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this<BR>> electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly<BR>> prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,<BR>> please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the<BR>> original documents. <BR>> Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and<BR>> accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data<BR>> corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the<BR>> consequences thereof.<BR>> Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the<BR>> individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the<BR>> sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of<BR>> its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,<BR>> officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability<BR>> for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained<BR>> herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/<BR>> business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and<BR>> shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding<BR>> agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into<BR>> any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: sap-wug-bounces@MIT.EDU [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@MIT.EDU] On Behalf<BR>> Of Susan R. Keohan<BR>> Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2006 5:23 AM<BR>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>> Subject: Validation of selected substitutes ?<BR>> <BR>> SRM 5.0,<BR>> Here's a weird one (what else do I ever send?)<BR>> <BR>> Certain approvers have strange and amazing powers, and it's important<BR>> that they not select <BR>> substitutes who do not also possess these same powers. Let's say these<BR>> strange and amazing powers <BR>> are manifest in SAP Authorizations, and SAP Org Objects, and SAP<BR>> Qualifications (HR).<BR>> We are resolving all our workflow tasks to the person level (positional<BR>> substitution does not apply).<BR>> <BR>> Is there anyway to check when a user picks a substitute, that the<BR>> substitute has the same attributes <BR>> as the picker ? (no really, please, don't laugh)<BR>> <BR>> Thanks!<BR>> <BR>> -- <BR>> Susan R. Keohan<BR>> SAP Workflow Developer<BR>> MIT Lincoln Laboratory<BR>> 244 Wood Street<BR>> LI-200<BR>> Lexington, MA. 02420<BR>> 781-981-3561<BR>> keohan@ll.mit.edu<BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> Message: 3<BR>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:37:03 -0500<BR>> From: "D Duchon" <duchond@comcast.net><BR>> Subject: EBP Worflow Trigger issue with multiple lines in SC<BR>> To: <sap-wug@mit.edu><BR>> Message-ID:<BR>> <200606280137.k5S1bAWr009677@pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR>> <BR>> Hello, I have an issue with EBP start conditions based on the material<BR>> group (prod category in EBP), my workflow is being triggered correctly for<BR>> shopping carts with one line item, But if I have a SC with multiple lines<BR>> the workflow is not trigged. Any suggestions? Should I be using<BR>> MaterialGroupList? If yes, how do you maintain a list. Using EBP v5.0<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Many thanks-<BR>> <BR>> -------------- next part --------------<BR>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060627/bbdb4c6f/attachment-0001.htm<BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> Message: 4<BR>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:43:20 -0700<BR>> From: "jerry.martinek" <jerry.martinek@shawbiz.ca><BR>> Subject: RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry<BR>> To: "'SAP Workflow Users' Group'" <sap-wug@mit.edu><BR>> Message-ID: <0J1J0006EU889D20@bpd2mi5no.prod.shawcable.com><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR>> <BR>> Hi Jocelyn,<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Thank for the feedback, I'll read up on this topic.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Thanks,<BR>> <BR>> Jerry<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _____ <BR>> <BR>> From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of<BR>> Dart, Jocelyn<BR>> Sent: June 27, 2006 4:29 PM<BR>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>> Subject: RE: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Jerry, <BR>> <BR>> If you have a 6.40 system or above in your landscape then use Extended<BR>> Notifications not RSWUWFML2 - from Extended Notifications you could tailor<BR>> the notifications to be read from all affected systems. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> I'm hoping to do some blogs some time on this topic but I want to finish the<BR>> OO series first. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Regards, <BR>> Jocelyn Dart <BR>> Senior Consultant <BR>> SAP Australia Pty Ltd. <BR>> Level 1/168 Walker St. <BR>> North Sydney <BR>> NSW, 2060 <BR>> Australia <BR>> T +61 412 390 267 <BR>> M + 61 412 390 267 <BR>> E jocelyn.dart@sap.com <BR>> http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/> <BR>> <BR>> The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission is<BR>> confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the<BR>> person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended<BR>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying, review,<BR>> retransmission, dissemination or other use of this electronic transmission<BR>> or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have<BR>> received this electronic transmission in error, please immediately contact<BR>> the sender to arrange for the return of the original documents. <BR>> <BR>> Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and accordingly,<BR>> the sender does not accept liability for any such data corruption,<BR>> interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the consequences<BR>> thereof.<BR>> <BR>> Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the<BR>> individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender<BR>> is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of its<BR>> subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors, officers and<BR>> employees make no representation nor accept any liability for the accuracy<BR>> or completeness of the views or information contained herein. Please be<BR>> aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/ business proposal<BR>> herein is indicative only, is subject to change and shall not be construed<BR>> as an offer or as constituting a binding agreement on the part of SAP AG or<BR>> any of its subsidiaries to enter into any relationship, unless otherwise<BR>> expressly stated. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _____ <BR>> <BR>> From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of<BR>> Mark Pyc<BR>> Sent: Sunday, 25 June 2006 5:47 PM<BR>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>> Subject: Re: EP 7.0 UWL Inquiry<BR>> <BR>> G'day Jerry,<BR>> <BR>> I can appreciate that what you're after is an UWL equivalent of RSWUWFML2.<BR>> i.e. like the UWL it would be central and only configured once rather than<BR>> in each backend system, but I don't think such functionality exists. I think<BR>> you just have to set up RSWUWFML2 in each system. <BR>> <BR>> Have fun,<BR>> Mark<BR>> <BR>> On 6/25/06, jerry.martinek <jerry.martinek@shawbiz.ca> wrote: <BR>> <BR>> Hi All,<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Is it possible to setup an UWL triggered email notification process if the<BR>> owner receives a workitem in their UWL? It's sort of the opposite<BR>> functionality of the UWL Alerts. The goal is to let the selected person know<BR>> that they have a waiting approval request in their UWL inbox.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> I've read through the documentation on the UWL but I couldn't find anything<BR>> on this subject.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Thanks,<BR>> <BR>> Jerry<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -------------- next part --------------<BR>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>> URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060627/c008dcc8/attachment.htm<BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 19, Issue 70<BR>> ***************************************<BR><BR><br /><hr />La future messagerie instantanée : <a href='http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=0eccd94b-eb48-497c-8e60-c6313f7ebb73' target='_new'>Essayez gratuitement Windows Live Messenger Beta</a></body>
</html>