<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=081235612-16052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>In a 4.7 Enterprise R/3 system last year, I worked at a
client with concurrent employment. I found problems with the 157 and 168 rules.
The function SWX_GET_MANAGER didn't read the HRP1001 table correctly. So I had
to create my own version of this FM. Think I posted the answer last year to the
group.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=081235612-16052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=081235612-16052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>I put in an OSS message but all SAP said was that they
would investigate for a future release as I had my work around Z function
in a rule.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=081235612-16052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=081235612-16052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Cheers</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=081235612-16052006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Dave</FONT></SPAN><SPAN
class=081235612-16052006> </SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Adao-Cruz,
Miguel<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:15 AM<BR><B>To:</B> SAP Workflow
Users' Group<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: SRM 5.0 and my Concurrent Employment
Issues<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText79743 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Hello,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Try debugging function SWX_GET_MANAGER and
see which links in HRP1001 it is following to find the manager.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>In a past project, debugging this function,
I realised that the workflow was not finding the correct manager (sometimes a
manager miles from the user branch!) because of inconsistencies in the HR
tables.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Cheers</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=idSignature63437 dir=ltr>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=navy size=1><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt; COLOR: navy">___________________________________________________________________________<BR></SPAN></FONT><FONT
color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy">Miguel
Adao-Cruz | <B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Capgemini</SPAN></B> |
London</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy"></SPAN></FONT><FONT color=navy size=1><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt; COLOR: navy">Technology Services</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=navy size=1><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt; COLOR: navy">SAP
Application Architect</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=navy size=1><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt; COLOR: navy"><BR>T.+44-870-238-2927 | Int.700 2927
| </SPAN></FONT><FONT color=navy><SPAN style="COLOR: navy"><A
href="file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\madaocru\Application%20Data\Microsoft\Signatures\www.capgemini.com,DanaInfo=OWA.UKI.CAPGEMINI.COM+"
target=_blank><FONT size=1><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt">www.capgemini.com</SPAN></FONT></A></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=navy size=1><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt; COLOR: navy"><BR>Join the Collaborative Business
Experience<BR>___________________________________________________________________________</SPAN></FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of jerry
martinek<BR><B>Sent:</B> Mon 15/05/2006 18:23<BR><B>To:</B>
sap-wug@mit.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> SRM 5.0 and my Concurrent Employment
Issues<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Hi All,</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">I need some help understanding
how the current concurrent employment (CE) implemented in SRM is supposed to
work or help me explaining to OSS that the CE SRM implementation is not correct
for workflow approvals.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">We’re a NW2004S / SRM5.0 ramp up
site. We’re also unfortunately implementing concurrent employment which seems to
be the source of a lot of my challenges. </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">In a CE scenario, a single person
can concurrently hold multiple employment contracts. For each contract they will
have a distinct P, S and US (logon id).</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">This means that they will have
multiple Ps, one per contract. Each P will be assigned to a single S. Each P
will also have one distinct US (PA0105-0001). The different Ps will be grouped
by a person id (CP).</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Example:</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">In the ERP HRP1001 table, P1 and
P2 are linked/joined by a CP1. US1 is linked to P1 and US2 is linked to P2. P1
is assigned to S1 and P2 is assigned to S2. S1 is linked to O1 and S2 is linked
to O2.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">The same scenario replicated into
the SRM HRP1001 table, a new CP1 is created from P1. P2 is not replicated into
SRM. All references to P2 are replaced by CP1. Only one BP is created for the
CP1. CP1 is linked to both S1 and S2. US1 and US2 are both linked to CP1. S1 is
linked to O1 and S2 is linked to O2.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">In PPOSA_BBP, the display shows
both ids assigned to each position, and the same CP and BP are also assigned to
the different positions.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">When I logon in with any of the
two USs in ERP, I get the correct superior of results. When I logon in with any
of the two USs in SRM, I always get the same result which is not correct.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">In the current SRM CE
implementation, I don’t see how you can figure out the correct position
assignment in order to figure out your correct approver.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">There are other issues as well
but this one is my most pressing one. Another example of an issue is in the area
of authorizations. </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">What am I missing? OSS keeps
telling me that there are no problems.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Regards,</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Jerry
Martinek</P></DIV></BODY></HTML>