<div>Margaret,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The release strategy is determined prior to kick off of the workflow. There are a couple of work arounds I can think of:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>1) Use one release in the background but have the user choose the release levels in between. In this case you are only using one dummy release strategy.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>2) Have all reqs require 8 approval levels. Then once the user has determined the number of approvals via the appropriate selection screen. Have go through the appropriate approvals. If there are extrat approvals have SAP release them automagically in the background.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>With regards,</div>
<div>Partha</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/27/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Hilsbos, Margaret A</b> <<a href="mailto:Margaret.Hilsbos@dayzim.com">Margaret.Hilsbos@dayzim.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Khurram,<br><br>Thanks for your reply.<br><br>Is it possible to require the user to select the release strategy or can it only be determined automatically by classification? In that case can we have a user entered characteristic? We are in
4.6c. I looked for a way for the user to enter a characteristic but didn't see one...do you know if it is possible?<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Margaret<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: <a href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">
sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</a>]On Behalf<br>Of <a href="mailto:kaukabr@yahoo.com">kaukabr@yahoo.com</a><br>Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 11:12 AM<br>
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<br>Subject: Re: Present pop-up to user on save of purchase requisition<br><br><br>Hi, You mean release strategy linking WITH workflow is<br>this true, if this your setup then you create release
<br>procedure with classification and setup workflow 1 and<br>assign users(Agents)directly in workflow screen.<br>I HAVE created 50 release strategies linking with<br>workflow and assign to the seperate Agents for<br>approvals IN PUR_REQ.
<br>I hope this will help you, if not please write me<br>back.<br>KHURRAM<br>--- "Hilsbos, Margaret A"<br><<a href="mailto:Margaret.Hilsbos@dayzim.com">Margaret.Hilsbos@dayzim.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>> Hello WUGers,
<br>><br>> We are looking at implementing the purchase<br>> requisition workflow in a 4.6c system. We are<br>> struggling with the logic for selecting the first<br>> approver in the release strategy. We have one person
<br>> who creates requisitions for several departments,<br>> and currently they just email the appropriate<br>> approver. If we use the standard rule with the IMG<br>> configuration to assign the approvers, the closest
<br>> we can get is to assign the security role for the<br>> release code -- which returns too many agents. The<br>> user exit doesn't seem to help because there is no<br>> value in the purchase requisition that can be used
<br>> to determine the correct recipient, which is based<br>> on the requester, not the requisition creator. The<br>> "requester" field doesn't help because that is a<br>> free text field (although only 12 characters). If
<br>> that field required a SAP user id then we could use<br>> that to derive the correct recipient.<br>><br>> After studying this I think it would be ideal if we<br>> could present the creator of the requisition with a
<br>> "choose agent" dialog when they save the<br>> requisition. However here is a stumbling block -<br>><br>> How to get the dialog presented to the user when the<br>> purchase requisition is saved? I believe workflow
<br>> doesn't do this, even if the first step is marked<br>> "advance with dialog". This general question keeps<br>> coming up in other contexts, too. I searched SDN<br>> forum and WUG archives with no luck, except to find
<br>> "it can't be done without a custom transaction" -<br>> is that still the case?<br>><br>> Does anyone have any other recommendations for the<br>> purchase requisition question? Am I (hopefully)
<br>> missing something obvious?<br>><br>> Any suggestions appreciated!<br>><br>><br>> Margaret Hilsbos<br>> Day & Zimmermann<br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________
<br>> SAP-WUG mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a><br>> <a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a><br>><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>SAP-WUG mailing list<br><a href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a><br><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
</a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>SAP-WUG mailing list<br><a href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a><br><a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>