<BODY><P>Hi,</P>
<P>Are you accessing the sub WF directly or inderictly via the main WF? We had a similar problem that&nbsp;we solved&nbsp;by accessing the sub-WF directly and then regenerating it. </P>
<P>Also have you tried accessing the WF via SWDS?</P>
<P>Jerry</P></BODY>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="=_alternative 004875AB8025712C_="


--=_alternative 004875AB8025712C_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Manish

I had the same (or similar) problem here.

I could access the workflow OK in the development client, but if I=20
referred to the workflow in any other client (PFTC, SWI1 etc) then I would =

get a short dumps.

Luckily this did not get as far as our production system.

Our problem was related to a condition node in the workflow that was=20
corrupted in some way, but SAP fixed it for me.

We were getting CALL=5FFUNCTION=5FREMOTE=5FERROR dumps at the rate of 1 per=
 second as the=20
program was looping . . . Is this what you are getting ?

Mike





"Khanna, Manish" <manish.khanna@amd.com>
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
08/03/2006 01:34
Please respond to "SAP Workflow Users' Group"

=20
        To:     "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug@mit.edu>
        cc:=20
        Subject:        Corrupt Sub WF definition.


Hi,
=20
I've found a peculiar problem.
=20
We have a logistic invoice approval workflow having a main process and an=20
approval 'sub workflow'. For some issue I need to look at the 'sub=20
workflow' definition but SWDD and PFTC give short dump when trying to=20
display the workflow definition.
=20
I tried in our production system also, but the issue remains.
=20
Interestingly the workflow is running fine, which means the runtime=20
version is intact.
=20
How can I recover the WF definition???
=20
Regards,
Manish=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug



--=_alternative 004875AB8025712C_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Manish</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">I had the same (or similar) problem =
here.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">I could access the workflow OK in th=
e development client, but if I referred to the workflow in any other client=
 (PFTC, SWI1 etc) then I would get a short dumps.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Luckily this did not get as far as o=
ur production system.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Our problem was related to a conditi=
on node in the workflow that was corrupted in some way, but SAP fixed it fo=
r me.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">We were getting </font>
<form action=3D"https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ=3D=3D)/bc/bs=
p/spn/smp=5Fcustmsg/main.do?event=3DLOAD&amp;smpsrv=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwebsmp2=
01%2Esap%2Dag%2Ede&amp;pointer=3D002007974700000946142006&amp;sid=3DUzAwMDI=
4Njg4NDB8MjAwNjAzMDh8MTQwMDA4|1" method=3Dpost><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-=
serif">CALL=5FFUNCTION=5FREMOTE=5FERROR dumps at the rate of 1 per second a=
s the program was looping . . . Is this what you are getting ?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Mike</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=3D100%>
<tr valign=3Dtop>
<td>
<td><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"><b>&quot;Khanna, Manish&quot; &lt;ma=
nish.khanna@amd.com&gt;</b></font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</fo=
nt>
<p><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">08/03/2006 01:34</font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Please respond to &quot;SAP Workflow=
 Users' Group&quot;</font>
<br>
<td><font size=3D1 face=3D"Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To: &nbs=
p; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&quot;SAP Workflow Users' Group&quot; &lt;sap-wug@mi=
t.edu&gt;</font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cc: &nbs=
p; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Subject:=
 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Corrupt Sub WF definition.</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">Hi,</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">I've found a peculiar problem.</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">We have a logistic invoice approval workf=
low having a main process and an approval 'sub workflow'. For some issue I =
need to look at the 'sub workflow' definition but SWDD and PFTC give short =
dump when trying to display the workflow definition.</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">I tried in our production system also, bu=
t the issue remains.</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">Interestingly the workflow is running fin=
e, which means the runtime version is intact.</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">How can I recover the WF definition???</f=
ont>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">Regards,</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">Manish</font><font size=3D2><tt>=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
</tt></font>
<br>
<br></form>
--=_alternative 004875AB8025712C_=--