<DIV>Hi All:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Miguel is correct. I submitted OSS messages to SAP, on this issue, for my last client. SAP's response was that it was working as designed. Also, due to the links to the Approval Applet, you can not change the SRM BADI Approval WF's to dynamic parallel processing. This was an issue because the SRM Approval WF's, were held up at one level, until all of the approvals at that level were completed. <DIV><BR>I hope this helps.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Thanks,</DIV> <DIV>Paul Borriello</DIV> <DIV>PAB Consulting, LLC</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV></DIV> <DIV><B><I>"Adao-Cruz, Miguel" <miguel.adao-cruz@capgemini.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Hello,<BR><BR>I have never seen something out-of-the-box using parallel branch.<BR>When you debug the process, after the!
BADI
processing, SRM does things with<BR>the branch index but I think this is used for the line items display in the<BR>approval applet.<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR><BR>___________________________________________________________________________<BR>Miguel Adao-Cruz | Capgemini | Woking<BR>Technology Services<BR>T.+44-870-238-2927 | Int.700 2927 | www.capgemini.com<BR><FILE: C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\madaocru\Application%20Data\Microsoft<br>\Signatures\www.capgemini.com,DanaInfo=OWA.UKI.CAPGEMINI.COM+> <BR><BR>Join the Collaborative Business Experience<BR>___________________________________________________________________________<BR><BR>________________________________<BR><BR>From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Susan R. Keohan<BR>Sent: Mon 12/12/2005 16:27<BR>To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>Subject: SRM Badi N-step<BR><BR><BR><BR>Hello all,<BR><BR>Can anyone verify that the N-step BAdi (BBP_WFL_APPROV), used in conjunction<BR>with the SAP-delivered<BR>Shopping Cart Approval W!
orkflows
(WS14000133, WS14000134) will allow you to<BR>accomodate parallel<BR>approval branches ? The BAdi allows you to set 'Approval_Branch', but I see<BR>nothing in the actual<BR>approval task to deal with dynamic parallel table processing. Of course,<BR>this would be easy enough<BR>to implement... I just wondered if the functionality was there 'out of the<BR>box'.<BR><BR>Thanks<BR>Sue<BR>--<BR>Susan R. Keohan<BR>SAP Workflow Developer<BR>MIT Lincoln Laboratory<BR>244 Wood Street<BR>LI-200<BR>Lexington, MA. 02420<BR>781-981-3561<BR>keohan@ll.mit.edu<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR><BR><BR>This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, dissemina!
te,
distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR></BLOCKQUOTE> <DIV><BR></DIV>