<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Yes Margaret . . . I tore my own hair out over this one !</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I think that I finally resolved it by deleting the dupicate binding and then backing all the way out of the builder (can't remember if I logged off and back on again as well).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">It was more than a year ago though and the old grey cells ain't what they used to be, but I think it was buffer related !</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Mike</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Hilsbos, Margaret A" <Margaret.Hilsbos@dayzim.com></b></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">27/09/2005 14:42</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to "SAP Workflow Users' Group"</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To: "SAP-WUG \(E-mail\)" <sap-wug@mit.edu></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc: </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject: Binding duplication on sendmail step?</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>Hello Workflowers,<br>
<br>
Has anyone had the experience of trying to modify a binding, it looks like it works, you save and generate, and when you test it still doesn't work, you go back and look at the binding and the duplicate lines you deleted are still there? Which, by the way, I have no idea how or why the duplicate lines showed up in the binding in the first place. <br>
<br>
Now I just deleted the step and, after many SWU_OBUFs, recreated it, making sure the binding was correct. I ran a test, it errored, and when I went back to look at the binding, not only were the lines duplicated again, but another row that I had intentionally omitted entirely, had showed up again.<br>
<br>
I searched OSS and came up empty. I would have searched the WUG on SDN but for some reason that page isn't working for me either. (is it still Monday? sure feels like it...)<br>
<br>
Has anyone else seen this bizarre behavior, and if so how did you fix it? <br>
<br>
We are on 6.20 and this is happening with a sendmail step.<br>
<br>
Thanks!<br>
<br>
Margaret Hilsbos<br>
Day & Zimmermann<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SAP-WUG mailing list<br>
SAP-WUG@mit.edu<br>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<br>
</tt></font>
<br>
<br>