<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi All,<br>
<br>
The IMG for SRM 4.0 says <br>
<br>
'Make sure that only <b>one</b> workflow is started for each
requirement coverage request, that means you must formulate the
conditions in such a way that a requirement coverage request cannot
fulfill more than one condition.'. <br>
<br>
Even though this is regarding requirement coverage requests, would this
same rule hold true for Contracts ?<br>
<br>
Has anyone turned on the standard WFs for contracts in SRM ? If so,
did you turn on WS14000086, or WS14000084 ? Our SRM consultant has the
start conditions for *both* workflows turned on.<br>
<br>
Still fishing, hoping for a nibble...<br>
Sue<br>
<br>
Susan R. Keohan wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid43342537.7020104@ll.mit.edu" type="cite">Hello
all,
<br>
<br>
This question is being posed from an old R/3 Workflow-er, so please
excuse my lack of knowledge about SRM.
<br>
<br>
We have upgraded from EBP 3.5 to SRM 4.0 in our sandbox environment.
This our landscape:
<br>
SAP_BASIS 640 SAPKB64011
<br>
SAP_ABA 640 SAPKA64011
<br>
SRM_SERVER 500 SAPKIBKS06
<br>
<br>
Our SRM consultant has enabled (via SPRO and SWB_COND) the standard SAP
workflow WS14000084 and WS14000086 for BUS2000113, events
CHANGEVERSIONSAVED and SAVED.
<br>
Example of Start Conditions is attached. All the 'normal' workflow
customizing has been carried out via SWU3. Event log is turned on.
Event linkage is activated, and the check functions are
<br>
SWB_2_CHECK_FB_START_COND_EVAL (WS14000084) and
SWB_CHECK_FB_START_COND_EVAL (WS14000086).
<br>
<br>
The contract is created, but of course, no workflow starts. Why else
would I be annoying you with this on a Friday.
<br>
<br>
SWUD for WS14000084 gives yellow lights on the binding between task
and event. Simulate Event gives red light for WS14000084, green light
for WS14000086. The information on WS14000084 is that there is an
error in the binding definition.
<br>
<br>
OSS Note 879528 refers to this workflow (WS14000084) in a different
context, but suggests changing the binding. Okay, I know how to do
that, but step 7 of this note says to change the binding to....
<br>
<br>
then there is nothing. No information on what the binding should be
changed *to*.
<br>
<br>
Can anyone shed some light on:
<br>
What the correct binding for this task should be ?
<br>
How to tell if the event is raised. I know in SRM that the standard
event log will not help.
<br>
What is the difference (in a nutshell) between the two check functions
? Why use one over the other ?
<br>
Any other tips and tricks to teach this old dog would be helpful.
<br>
<br>
Thanks!
<br>
Sue
<br>
<br>
<br>
<hr size="4" width="90%"><br>
<center><img src="cid:part1.09090606.03080208@ll.mit.edu"></center>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="100">--
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:keohan@ll.mit.edu">keohan@ll.mit.edu</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>