<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=499535814-26092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Hi Sue, I used to use the function module
BBP_PDH_WFL_CHECK_BEFORE_START (hope its the right one !!) in test mode to
check the start conditions and which workflows should be started.
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=499535814-26092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>It was very helpful for the shopping carts approval
wokflows and I think if you put the right onject type in and your Guid it might
help you work out whats going on.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=499535814-26092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=499535814-26092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Cheers</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=499535814-26092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Dave</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Susan R.
Keohan<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, September 26, 2005 10:30 AM<BR><B>To:</B> SAP
Workflow Users' Group<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: WS14000084 for contracts on SRM 4.0
not starting<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Hi All,<BR><BR>The IMG for SRM 4.0 says <BR><BR>'Make sure that only
<B>one</B> workflow is started for each requirement coverage request, that means
you must formulate the conditions in such a way that a requirement coverage
request cannot fulfill more than one condition.'. <BR><BR>Even though this
is regarding requirement coverage requests, would this same rule hold true for
Contracts ?<BR><BR>Has anyone turned on the standard WFs for contracts in SRM
? If so, did you turn on WS14000086, or WS14000084 ? Our SRM
consultant has the start conditions for *both* workflows turned on.<BR><BR>Still
fishing, hoping for a nibble...<BR>Sue<BR><BR>Susan R. Keohan wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid43342537.7020104@ll.mit.edu type="cite">Hello all,
<BR><BR>This question is being posed from an old R/3 Workflow-er, so please
excuse my lack of knowledge about SRM. <BR><BR>We have upgraded from EBP 3.5
to SRM 4.0 in our sandbox environment. This our landscape:
<BR>SAP_BASIS
640 SAPKB64011
<BR>SAP_ABA
640 SAPKA64011
<BR>SRM_SERVER 500
SAPKIBKS06 <BR><BR>Our SRM consultant has enabled (via SPRO and SWB_COND) the
standard SAP workflow WS14000084 and WS14000086 for BUS2000113, events
CHANGEVERSIONSAVED and SAVED. <BR>Example of Start Conditions is
attached. All the 'normal' workflow customizing has been carried out via
SWU3. Event log is turned on. Event linkage is activated, and the
check functions are <BR>SWB_2_CHECK_FB_START_COND_EVAL (WS14000084) and
SWB_CHECK_FB_START_COND_EVAL (WS14000086). <BR><BR>The contract is created,
but of course, no workflow starts. Why else would I be annoying you with
this on a Friday. <BR><BR>SWUD for WS14000084 gives yellow lights on the
binding between task and event. Simulate Event gives red light for
WS14000084, green light for WS14000086. The information on WS14000084 is
that there is an error in the binding definition. <BR><BR>OSS Note 879528
refers to this workflow (WS14000084) in a different context, but suggests
changing the binding. Okay, I know how to do that, but step 7 of this
note says to change the binding to.... <BR><BR>then there is nothing. No
information on what the binding should be changed *to*. <BR><BR>Can anyone
shed some light on: <BR>What the correct binding for this task should be ?
<BR>How to tell if the event is raised. I know in SRM that the standard
event log will not help. <BR>What is the difference (in a nutshell) between
the two check functions ? Why use one over the other ? <BR>Any other tips and
tricks to teach this old dog would be helpful. <BR><BR>Thanks! <BR>Sue
<BR><BR><BR>
<HR width="90%" SIZE=4>
<BR>
<CENTER><IMG src="cid:499535814@26092005-1FCA"></CENTER><PRE wrap=""><HR width="90%" SIZE=4>
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
<A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A>
<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><PRE class=moz-signature cols="100">--
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
<A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:keohan@ll.mit.edu">keohan@ll.mit.edu</A>
</PRE></BODY></HTML>