<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Thank you Jocelyn and Dave!<br>
<br>
Yes, of course the problem was that the start conditions were<br>
a) Trying to start a subworkflow, as well as<br>
b) Trying to start a main workflow (with conditions that had the same
outcome)<br>
<br>
So, I have successfully turned on the correct SAP-delivered workflow
for contracts with no approval, WS14000086, and have an extra trick
from Dave. <br>
<br>
Thank you so very very much!<br>
Sue<br>
<br>
Dart, Jocelyn wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="midEFB207BF0F7FAA47A800709C57D0523D01972F3C@sgsine10.sin.sap.corp"
type="cite">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1515" name="GENERATOR">
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">Yes Sue - you should make sure
only one workflow starts for a particular contract and the event SAVED
or CHANGEVERSIONSAVED. Your conditions should be mutually exclusive. </font></span></div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">You can have the same contract
go to different workflows for SAVED versus CHANGEVERSIONSAVED - that's
fine. </font></span></div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"></span> </div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">This is not just a technical
restriction - it's logically what must happen - i.e. only one contract
approval workflow must be active for a particular contract at any one
time.</font></span></div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"></span><span
class="770465214-26092005"></span><span class="770465214-26092005"></span> </div>
<div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">Woah - just looked at the
workflows - you should not be turning on the WS14000084 Update Contract
after Approval workflow anyway - that's a subworkflow! That doesn't
even have the SAVED or CHANGEVERSIONSAVED events in standard!
Someone's been modifying.... get them to fix it before it causes more
problems. </font></span></div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"></span> </div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="770465214-26092005"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">Please re-educate your SRM
consultant. </font></span></font></span></div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"><span class="770465214-26092005"></span></font></span> </div>
<div align="left" dir="ltr"><span class="770465214-26092005"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">You only turn on the main
workflows - WS14000086, WS14000088, WS14000148, etc. </font></span></div>
</div>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<p><span lang="en-us"><font face="Arial" size="1">Regards,</font></span>
<br>
<span lang="en-us"><b><font color="#000080" face="Arial" size="1">Jocelyn
Dart</font></b></span> <br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">Senior
Consultant</font></span> <br>
<span lang="en-us"><b><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">SAP
Australia Pty Ltd.</font></b></span> <br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">Level
1/168 Walker St.</font></span> <br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">North
Sydney </font></span><br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">NSW,
2060</font></span> <br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">Australia</font></span>
<br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">T
+61 412 390 267</font></span> <br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">M +
61 412 390 267</font></span> <br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1">E
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jocelyn.dart@sap.com">jocelyn.dart@sap.com</a></font></span> <br>
<span lang="en-us"><font color="#808080" face="Arial" size="1"><a
href="http://www.sap.com/">http://www.sap.com</a></font></span> </p>
<p><span lang="en-au"><font color="#ff0000" face="Times New Roman"
size="1">The information contained in or attached to this electronic
transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
distribution, copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other
use of this electronic transmission or the information contained in it
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender to arrange
for the return of the original documents. </font></span></p>
<p><span lang="en-au"><font color="#ff0000" face="Times New Roman"
size="1">Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and
accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data
corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or
the consequences thereof.</font></span></p>
<p><span lang="en-au"><font color="#ff0000" face="Times New Roman"
size="1">Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those
of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and
the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any
of its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,
officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability
for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained
herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/
business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and
shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding
agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter
into any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated. </font></span></p>
<div> </div>
<br>
<div class="OutlookMessageHeader" align="left" dir="ltr" lang="en-us">
<hr tabindex="-1"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</a>] <b>On Behalf
Of </b>Susan R. Keohan<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, 27 September 2005 12:30 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> SAP Workflow Users' Group<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: WS14000084 for contracts on SRM 4.0 not starting<br>
</font><br>
</div>
Hi All,<br>
<br>
The IMG for SRM 4.0 says <br>
<br>
'Make sure that only <b>one</b> workflow is started for each
requirement coverage request, that means you must formulate the
conditions in such a way that a requirement coverage request cannot
fulfill more than one condition.'. <br>
<br>
Even though this is regarding requirement coverage requests, would this
same rule hold true for Contracts ?<br>
<br>
Has anyone turned on the standard WFs for contracts in SRM ? If so,
did you turn on WS14000086, or WS14000084 ? Our SRM consultant has the
start conditions for *both* workflows turned on.<br>
<br>
Still fishing, hoping for a nibble...<br>
Sue<br>
<br>
Susan R. Keohan wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid43342537.7020104@ll.mit.edu" type="cite">Hello
all, <br>
<br>
This question is being posed from an old R/3 Workflow-er, so please
excuse my lack of knowledge about SRM. <br>
<br>
We have upgraded from EBP 3.5 to SRM 4.0 in our sandbox environment.
This our landscape: <br>
SAP_BASIS 640 SAPKB64011 <br>
SAP_ABA 640 SAPKA64011 <br>
SRM_SERVER 500 SAPKIBKS06 <br>
<br>
Our SRM consultant has enabled (via SPRO and SWB_COND) the standard SAP
workflow WS14000084 and WS14000086 for BUS2000113, events
CHANGEVERSIONSAVED and SAVED. <br>
Example of Start Conditions is attached. All the 'normal' workflow
customizing has been carried out via SWU3. Event log is turned on.
Event linkage is activated, and the check functions are <br>
SWB_2_CHECK_FB_START_COND_EVAL (WS14000084) and
SWB_CHECK_FB_START_COND_EVAL (WS14000086). <br>
<br>
The contract is created, but of course, no workflow starts. Why else
would I be annoying you with this on a Friday. <br>
<br>
SWUD for WS14000084 gives yellow lights on the binding between task
and event. Simulate Event gives red light for WS14000084, green light
for WS14000086. The information on WS14000084 is that there is an
error in the binding definition. <br>
<br>
OSS Note 879528 refers to this workflow (WS14000084) in a different
context, but suggests changing the binding. Okay, I know how to do
that, but step 7 of this note says to change the binding to.... <br>
<br>
then there is nothing. No information on what the binding should be
changed *to*. <br>
<br>
Can anyone shed some light on: <br>
What the correct binding for this task should be ? <br>
How to tell if the event is raised. I know in SRM that the standard
event log will not help. <br>
What is the difference (in a nutshell) between the two check functions
? Why use one over the other ? <br>
Any other tips and tricks to teach this old dog would be helpful. <br>
<br>
Thanks! <br>
Sue <br>
<br>
<br>
<hr size="4" width="90%"> <br>
<center><img src="cid:part1.01020105.06020508@ll.mit.edu"></center>
<pre wrap=""><hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="100">--
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:keohan@ll.mit.edu">keohan@ll.mit.edu</a>
</pre>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="100">--
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:keohan@ll.mit.edu">keohan@ll.mit.edu</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>