<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=040321705-21092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Get the marriage anulled immediately!</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=040321705-21092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=040321705-21092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Is the manager determined from employee number (which I
assume has not changed) or from user name?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=040321705-21092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>If it is from user name, check that infotype 0105 is
correct.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=040321705-21092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=040321705-21092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>If infotype 0105 is correct, could the problem be that some
of the time sheet entries are from before her name change and some of them from
after the name change?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=040321705-21092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=040321705-21092005><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Seems they made a wise choice when they decided to use
employee number as user name here in Statoil, I have heard rumours from other
places about user name changes being a pain.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>-- </FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil KTJ IT
BKS</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>gladys.sinclair@ukaea.org.uk<BR><B>Sent:</B> 20. september 2005
14:17<BR><B>To:</B> SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR><B>Subject:</B> User Change of
Name: Workflow Recipient Could not be determined <BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>I'm stuck and
looking for inspiration!</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>One of our
users, Lindsay Mackay, got married and changed her name to Lindsay Foubister.
</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>She has been changed in SU01,
PA30, OOSB and when I do a rule 168 to find the superior of (under her new
name), it comes up with her correct Line Manager.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2>However, when she is trying to save and release her
timesheet, she is getting an error message of</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2> 'Time sheet contains errors. You cannot
save</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Workflow recipient could not be
determined.'</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Could anyone give me an
idea of where to look next?</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Thanks
in anticipation.</FONT><p></p><p><font size=1>-------------------------------------------------------------------<br>The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is<br>intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the<br>information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the<br>addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete<br>this message.<br>Thank you.</font size></BODY></HTML>