<DIV>thanks Marc , I will search for OSS notes to get rid of this problem .<BR><BR><B><I>Mark Pyc <mark.pyc@gmail.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">G'day Sudhir,<BR><BR>In a 620 system I had a lot of problems with subflows. There are a<BR>number of OSS notes that need to be applied - unfortunately I don't<BR>have the number you need.<BR><BR>Searching on subflow should bring them up.<BR><BR>Also, as always with problems that work when restarted with SWPR,<BR>check that you're not hitting authorization errors. WF is funny in<BR>that a lot of runtime functions occur using the authorizations of the<BR>last user.<BR><BR>Have fun,<BR>Mark<BR><BR>On 7/1/05, Sudhir Chauhan <SUDHIR_CHAUHAN_US@YAHOO.COM>wrote:<BR>> Dear WF gurus ,<BR>> <BR>> I am getting this error no. WL 444 . The Workflow was not progressed to the<BR>> Sub-Workflow .<BR>> I restarted the WF using transaction SWPR and it worked .<BR>> <BR>> Has anybody faced with this kind of error ?<BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> Sudhir <BR>> <BR>>
__________________________________________________<BR>> Do You Yahoo!?<BR>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <BR>> http://mail.yahoo.com <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>> <BR>> <BR>><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG mailing list<BR>SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com