<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RE: deleted task shows up in new workflow instances</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=375294013-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Hi
Alon,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375294013-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375294013-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>i
would prefer an additional ABAP Report to clear the field, which runs as Batch
once a day. In my opinion it makes little sense to keep these Workflows for
two years in "running" mode.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375294013-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375294013-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Greetings,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375294013-05052005></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375294013-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Thomas Lorenz</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375294013-05052005><FONT size=2><BR><BR></FONT><FONT
size=2><FONT face=Arial>mobil <SPAN class=375294013-05052005>+ 49
</SPAN>170 3558989<BR>mail tlorenz@web-ls.de<BR>fon <SPAN
class=375294013-05052005>+ 49 </SPAN>228 3867985<BR>fax <SPAN
class=375294013-05052005>+ 49 </SPAN>228 3868844</FONT><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----<BR><B>Von:</B> Alon Raskin
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu]<B>Im Auftrag von </B>Alon
Raskin<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2005 14:53<BR><B>An:</B> SAP
Workflow Users' Group<BR><B>Betreff:</B> RE: 2 year wait vs Batch
Report<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText63325 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi Ram,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks for the input. My problem with
this approach is that I now have a batch job scheduled for each instance of
the workflow (around 400 or so)... I guess it not a big deal but I am not sure
I am seeing what the advantages of using this over the deadline monitoring
report...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=idSignature20148 dir=ltr>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>Alon Raskin</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>e: </STRONG><A
href="mailto:araskin@3i-consulting.com"
target=_blank><STRONG>araskin@3i-consulting.com</STRONG></A></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>p: +61 3 9625 2189 (Head
Office)</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>f: +61 3 8610 1239 </STRONG></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>c: +1 207 756 0370</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>w: </STRONG><A
href="/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.3i-consulting.com/"
target=_blank><STRONG>http://www.3i-consulting.com</STRONG></A></DIV></STRONG></DIV></FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of
Tiwari, Rammanohar<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thu 5/5/2005 08:49<BR><B>To:</B> SAP
Workflow Users' Group<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: 2 year wait vs Batch
Report<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I
think there might be another option ( Not sure though
) :</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Just
after that step in your workflow put another step which will schedule a Batch
Job (FM BP_JOB_CREATE) with release date = sy-datum + 2
years.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>I am not sure but system restart should not affect it.
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>The
Batch job will then trigger an event ( after two years ) to
re-start the terminated workflow.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Thanks,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Ram</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=959333712-05052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Alon
Raskin<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:26 PM<BR><B>To:</B> SAP
Workflow Users' Group<BR><B>Subject:</B> 2 year wait vs Batch
Report<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText72845 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Hi Everyone,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>I would love to hear peoples opinions
on this issue.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>We have a situation where a workflow
has to do update a field and then wait for 2 years before clearing that
field. There are two possibilities to this issue.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>1. Put in a 2 year wait
step</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>2. Terminate the workflow and run a
nightly batch job which would query some table and determine if 2 years have
passed and then reset the field accordingly.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Currently I am leaning towards option 1
as I really don't see a difference in option 1 and option 2. Ultimately they
are all just batch jobs which check dates and then do some processing. The
volumes here are very low.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Your thoughts?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=idSignature14617 dir=ltr>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>Alon Raskin</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG>e: </STRONG><A
href="mailto:araskin@3i-consulting.com"
target=_blank><STRONG>araskin@3i-consulting.com</STRONG></A></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><STRONG></STRONG></DIV><STRONG>w: </STRONG><A
href="/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.3i-consulting.com/"
target=_blank><STRONG>http://www.3i-consulting.com</STRONG></A></STRONG></FONT></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>This
e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s)
only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be
subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or
used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please
promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the
sender. Thank you.<BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>