<p>Hi,</p><p>You could try transaction SWPC - Continue Workflow After
System Crash... I never tried it but if you look at the program help that
one of the reason it was created for.</p><p /><p>Serge</p><p><br />>
<br />> Mike, <br />> <br />> <br />> <br />> Thank for
your reply. <br />> <br />> <br />> <br />> We have a few
probably around 10 or more work items sitting in user’s <br />> inbox.
These are work items left from the beginning of using this WF, <br />>
caused by operation error. <br />> <br />> Also once in a while,
even though the user has processed the workflow, <br />> the item still
stays in the inbox. This WF is one-step task (30001128 <br />>
&30001117). User cannot set the WF to done. This option is greyed out.
<br />> In other words, there is no way that we can change the WF
status to be <br />> completed or cancelled. This item will not
disappear from the work item <br />> list, as it should be. <br />>
<br />> Besides the deletion option, is there any other way to clear up
this? <br />> <br />> <br />> <br />> Thanks, <br />> <br
/>> Cindy <br />> <br />> <br />> Michael Pokraka
<workflow@quirky.me.uk />wrote:Hi Cindy, <br />> <br />> It is not
only the risk that you need to consider, this may have serious <br />>
audit <br />> implications. <br />> <br />> Perhaps you can tell
us why this is an 'immediate requirement'? <br />> <br />> Cheers
<br />> Mike <br />> <br />> <br />> --- Qiru w wrote: <br
/>>> <br />>> Hi, all, <br />>> <br />>> <br
/>>> <br />>> We have an issue regarding deletion of unwanted
work items in production <br />>> system. According to SAP's
recommendation, archive is the best approach. <br />>> However, the
problem is that we are not planning to implement archiving <br />>>
functionality in the near future, but production has this immediate <br
/>>> requirement. <br />>> <br />>> Alternatively, SAP
provide two reports SWWWIDE and SWWHIDE to delete <br />>> work <br
/>>> item in development/testing environment, which will delete work
items <br />>> permanently and directly. However, SAP emphasizes on
the risk of using <br />>> these <br />>> reports and only
suggests using it in non-production system. <br />>> <br />>>
<br />>> <br />>> Can these two reports act as practical
solution to eliminate work items <br />>> in <br />>>
production? <br />>> <br />>> Does anyone actually use this in
production? <br />>> <br />>> How to use it up to make it
secure and reduce the risk of mistakenly <br />>> using <br
/>>> the program? I am planning to use a dummy user who will get
those work <br />>> items <br />>> need to be deleted and set
the running variant and authorization to this <br />>> user <br
/>>> only. <br />>> <br />>> <br />>> <br
/>>> Any suggestion is appreciated. <br />>> <br />>>
<br />>> <br />>> Thanks a lot, <br />>> <br />>>
Cindy <br />>> <br />>> <br />>> <br />>> <br
/>>> <br />>> --------------------------------- <br />>>
Do you Yahoo!? <br />>> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new
resources site! > <br />>
_______________________________________________ <br />>> SAP-WUG
mailing list <br />>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu <br />>>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug <br />>> <br />>
_______________________________________________ <br />> SAP-WUG mailing
list <br />> SAP-WUG@mit.edu <br />>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug <br />> <br />> <br
/>> <br />> --------------------------------- <br />> Do you
Yahoo!? <br />> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! <br
/>> _______________________________________________ <br />> SAP-WUG
mailing list <br />> SAP-WUG@mit.edu <br />>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug <br />> <br /><br /><br
/>Serge Boulay <br />Associate/Associé <br />cell. (514) 830-0750 <br
/>skype user: sergeboulay <br /><br />/n-Spro inc. <br />5 Lakebreeze <br
/>Pointe-Claire (Québec) <br />Canada, H9S 5H8 <br />phone: (514) 624-5196
<br />fax: (518) 207-9005 <br />www.n-spro.com <br /><br /></p>