Database update incomplete after changedoc event
Michael Pokraka
workflow at quirky.me.uk
Tue Feb 1 12:04:44 EST 2005
Hi Mark,
Agreed, I would personally like to get further in depth on this one.
However, I believe you are familiar with the client I'm at - a certain
pharmaceutical company. The process surrounding the bug - if it is one - is a
little messier than I described, it involves Prospects bouncing from CRM to R/3
and only happens when multiples are submitted in a batch. Need I say more?
This is unfortunately a frustration that afflicts projects far too often...
Cheers
Mike
--- Mark Pyc <markpyc at hotmail.com> wrote:
> That doesn't stop you raising it with OSS all the same for the sake of
> completeness... maybe the more elegant solution will be provided by SAP
> before your WF has finished testing and hit production. Maybe not, but
> maybe. I mean if we can't trust SWEC who can we trust???
>
> From: Michael Pokraka <workflow at quirky.me.uk>
> Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Subject: RE: Database update incomplete after changedoc event
> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:37:53 -0800 (PST)
>
> Hi Mark,
> Pretty much my suspicions. I double-checked, the CD is written in a V2
> update.
> So I also checked the source of the change - hey, the whole thing is
> SAP-standard configured stuff! It comes in via RFC... so a possibility is
> that
> the data is created in V2 as well.
>
> Defo an OSS thing I'd say, but alas, the powers that be have decided that
> it's
> more important to get it working and move on rather than fix it properly
> (the
> usual dilemma that we all face!). So now I have 1 minute requested start in
> the
> WF and a few happy people.
>
> Still, it does throw a bit of a shadow over the CD reliability...
> Thanks for the input!
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> --- Mark Pyc <markpyc at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > G'day Mike,
> >
> > In theory all change documents Should be written in V2 updates which
> Should
> > mean that all other significant updates are already completed via V1
> > updates. But of course Should is a powerful word.
> >
> > If the Change Docs are being written in V1 they shouldn't be. If they're
> > done via V2 but the V1 main data is not available then that throws a big
> > spanner in the reliability of SWEC raised events - supposedly the most
> > reliable.
> >
> > I've never had troubles with it. I'd be raising it with OSS.
> >
> > Have fun,
> > Mark
> >
> > From: Michael Pokraka <workflow at quirky.me.uk>
> > Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > To: SAP Workflow User Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Subject: Database update incomplete after changedoc event
> > Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 03:48:04 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > Hi all,
> > Quick question (more of an opinion poll): I've an event triggered off a
> > change
> > document, but the data is still not available once the WF starts (the
> first
> > step's binding trips over blank attributes). This should not be, how
> > reliable
> > are we supposed to consider change docs in terms of up-to-date-ness?
> >
> > It's a 5 minute fix to put a delay into a check FM, but.... that's ugly
> and
> > half the point of events is that we're supposed to be able to rely on DB
> > consistency. If it's supposed to be reliable then I'd rather get OSS to
> look
> > at
> > it. Oh, I did check, the attribute is based on a table that's included in
> > the
> > changedoc.
> >
> > Any input appreciated,
> > Cheers
> > Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list