Compensation Management Workflow

[Thomas Maue]

Sarah,
 
Don't know which one is selected.  Fill in all administrator entries
with different userid's and experiment (please let me know).  There
shouldn't be too many entries.  My bet is - the personnel officer of
the last personnel number of the group.
 
Tom
 
"Jackson, Sarah A" wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> With the compensation management workflow,  the compensation adjustment can
> be perfomed for multiple employees, all of whom may have different personnel
> officers, so how does one particular personnel officer get selected?
>
> Regards,
>
> Sarah
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Maue [mailto:r0773c at email.sps.mot.com]
> Sent: 04 December 2000 19:42
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: Compensation Management Workflow
>
> Sarah,
>
> This is referencing an attribute of Business Object PERSCLERK (personnel
> officer).  Personnel officers are set up in HR configuration and stored
> in table T526.  Key fields are administration group and administrator.
> A valid SAP userid (without the US) must be entered into the table entry
> in order for this attribute to return.
>
> Each personnel number has a personnel officer which can be set up when
> hiring.  The HR Organization Assignment screen contains this field.
>
> You probably do not have an administrator setup for one particular entry
> which causes the Illegal expression ' '.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom Maue
>
> "Jackson, Sarah A" wrote:
> >
> > Workflow gurus,
> >
> > Has anyone worked with the compensation management workflow? I am working
> on
> > version 4.6b and in the last step of the workflow - step TS01000147, the
> > approved salary adjsustments are activated by expression
> > &WORKQUEUE.ADMINISTRATOR.USERID&.
> >
> > I'm not sure where this expression is finding an agent and am getting
> error
> > message 'Illegal expression ' ' for agent'when I test the workflow.
> >
> > Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I could find out where the
> > expression is finding an agent or does anyone know this?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sarah Jackson