<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/mar2007/id20070302_219704.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_more+of+today%2527s+top+stories">An article</a> on from BusinessWeek... there is a favorable mention of OpenWetWare somewhere on the second page:
<br><br><br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"><p>
As large-scale scientific collaborations become the norm, scientists
will rely increasingly on distributed methods of collecting data,
verifying discoveries, and testing hypotheses not only to speed things
up but to improve the veracity of scientific knowledge itself. For
example, rapid, iterative, and open-access publishing will engage a
much greater proportion of the scientific community in the peer-review
process. Conventional paper-based scientific journals, meanwhile, will
be augmented by dynamic publishing tools such as blogs, wikis,
Web-enabled RSS feeds, and podcasts that turn scientific publications
into living documents. Projects such as MIT's OpenWetWare are already
doing this.
</p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/mar2007/id20070302_219704.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_more+of+today%27s+top+stories">http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/mar2007/id20070302_219704.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_more+of+today%27s+top+stories
</a></blockquote>
<br>Apparently, we are again an "MIT" project... Apologies to those of you who are not. <br><br>Sri<br><a href="http://openwetware.org/wiki/Sriram_Kosuri">http://openwetware.org/wiki/Sriram_Kosuri</a><br><br>