From jasonk at MIT.EDU Mon Jan 8 09:07:45 2007 From: jasonk at MIT.EDU (Jason Kelly) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:07:45 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] SC meeting on Thursday (1/9) at Noon Message-ID: <7c085c480701080607h74e17bfn238b22b939bd25d2@mail.gmail.com> Hi SC, Just a reminder that the Steering Committee meeting this Thursday, Jan 11, at Noon in 32-262 (Stata Center). Lunch will be provided. If you are planning on calling in, please let me know. The meeting agenda can be found here: http://openwetware.org/wiki/OpenWetWare:Steering_committee_next_meeting As usual, please add anything you'd like to talk about. Thanks! jason From jasonk at MIT.EDU Mon Jan 8 13:13:26 2007 From: jasonk at MIT.EDU (Jason Kelly) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:13:26 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] SC meeting on Thursday (1/11) at Noon Message-ID: <7c085c480701081013i35c09829qba7b5f434593cd39@mail.gmail.com> To be clear - the meeting is on this Thursday, the 11th - please excuse the incorrect date in my previous email subject line. thanks, jason On 1/8/07, Jason Kelly wrote: > Hi SC, > > Just a reminder that the Steering Committee meeting this Thursday, > Jan 11, at Noon in 32-262 (Stata Center). Lunch will be > provided. If you are planning on calling in, please let me know. > > The meeting agenda can be found here: > http://openwetware.org/wiki/OpenWetWare:Steering_committee_next_meeting > > As usual, please add anything you'd like to talk about. > > Thanks! > jason > From jasonk at MIT.EDU Tue Jan 9 15:43:46 2007 From: jasonk at MIT.EDU (Jason Kelly) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:43:46 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] Meeting change to Thursday 1/18 @ Noon in 68-151 Message-ID: <7c085c480701091243o7884cad7s8af6b2868278cfeb@mail.gmail.com> Hi folks, So due to conflicts with the BioSysBio conference and holiday trips, it looks like 4-5 folks won't be able to come by for the steering committee meeting on Thursday. So we're going to go ahead and rechedule for next Thursday, 1/18, at Noon. The room will be changed to 68-151. Food will be provided. Let me know if you're planning on calling in, apologies for the change. Thanks, jason From endy at MIT.EDU Tue Jan 16 15:54:50 2007 From: endy at MIT.EDU (Drew Endy) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:54:50 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] news from NSF Message-ID: OWW SC folks, I spoke w/ Peter McCartney in the Division of Biological Infrastructure at the US NSF regarding our NSF BDI grant application. A copy of the grant is online here: http://openwetware.org/wiki/OpenWetWare:Steering_committee/ NSF_BDI_Grant/Description#Budget NSF is v. excited about the proposal and OWW but would like to receive a revised statement of work focusing on the next three years of OWW development before making an official funding decision. I would like to reconnect w/ Peter to discuss our response later this week. Given the recent NIH award (1-year) and the need to successfully respond to NSF in order to secure longer term support (3-5 years), now is a v. good time to consider our priorities for OWW development (especially in terms of how we spend actual money). Please contribute your thoughts here: http://openwetware.org/wiki/OpenWetWare:Respond_to_NSF This is an obvious topic for discussion at next SC meeting too. Belated Happy 2007! Drew From jasonk at MIT.EDU Wed Jan 17 03:04:34 2007 From: jasonk at MIT.EDU (Jason Kelly) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:04:34 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] news from NSF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7c085c480701170004h7bdcd2f1p96f85c7118851990@mail.gmail.com> Reminder that the SC meeting will be at Noon on Thursday (18th) in 68-151 (note room). Lunch will be provided. Please email me if you will be calling in. Thanks, jason On 1/16/07, Drew Endy wrote: > OWW SC folks, > > I spoke w/ Peter McCartney in the Division of Biological > Infrastructure at the US NSF regarding our NSF BDI grant > application. A copy of the grant is online here: > http://openwetware.org/wiki/OpenWetWare:Steering_committee/ > NSF_BDI_Grant/Description#Budget > > NSF is v. excited about the proposal and OWW but would like to > receive a revised statement of work focusing on the next three years > of OWW development before making an official funding decision. > > I would like to reconnect w/ Peter to discuss our response later this > week. > > Given the recent NIH award (1-year) and the need to successfully > respond to NSF in order to secure longer term support (3-5 years), > now is a v. good time to consider our priorities for OWW development > (especially in terms of how we spend actual money). > > Please contribute your thoughts here: > http://openwetware.org/wiki/OpenWetWare:Respond_to_NSF > > This is an obvious topic for discussion at next SC meeting too. > > Belated Happy 2007! > Drew > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenWetWare Steering Committee Mailing List > sc at openwetware.org > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-sc > From tk at csail.mit.edu Mon Jan 22 19:24:26 2007 From: tk at csail.mit.edu (Tom Knight) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:24:26 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] Open Access science at 3 Quarks Daily Message-ID: <17bdf00f69b106be18a55a687e1e6a66@csail.mit.edu> http://www.3quarksdaily.com/ The Future of Science is Open, Part 3: An Open Science World -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 172 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070122/deda0b98/attachment.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6620 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070122/deda0b98/attachment-0001.bin From endy at MIT.EDU Thu Jan 25 20:58:23 2007 From: endy at MIT.EDU (endy@MIT.EDU) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:58:23 +0000 Subject: [OWW-SC] Slashdot | Science Journal Publishers Wary of Free Information Message-ID: <347846560-1169776859-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-1720179128-@bxe008-cell02.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/01/25/2155223.shtml The comments are a good read. Drew Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless From johncumbers at gmail.com Sat Jan 27 11:47:34 2007 From: johncumbers at gmail.com (John Cumbers) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:47:34 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] [OWW-Admin] (Message for OpenWetWare Steering Committee) OpenWetWare.org and OpenDryWare.org aka myExperiment.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Carol Goble is a big name in the UK, one of the tutorials at BioSysBio was on Taverna and I think this might be something worth pursuing. cheers, John On 1/27/07, Antoon Goderis wrote: > > > Dear Open Wet Ware Steering Committee, > > We have recently come across the existence of the Open Wet Ware portal > with interest and delight. In the context of the myGrid project [1] and > its Taverna workbench [2], we are currently prototyping a similar > initiative for bioinformaticians working in silico in the 'dry lab' of > the Web, dubbed myExperiment.org (see [3],[4]). Bar some important > differences, it would seem much of the overarching vision and underlying > infrastructure for sharing and reuse is the same for wet lab and dry lab > protocols. You can find some of our plans on-line at [5] and [6]. > > We noticed your recent call for comments based on your NSF proposal > feedback. Our project recently secured funding for full time myExperiment > developers. It would be great if we could join forces and not reinvent > any wheels. > > Carole Goble, the myGrid project leader, is visiting Boston next week for > a talk [7]. Would you be available to hook up with her for a chat on > Friday February 2nd? She can be reached at carole at cs.man.ac.uk > > Best regards, > > Antoon Goderis, on behalf of the myGrid team > Information Management Group > University of Manchester > United Kingdom > > http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:AntoonGoderis > > -- > [1] http://www.mygrid.org.uk > [2] http://taverna.sourceforge.net > [3] http://www.myexperiment.org/ > [4] http://www.newscientisttech.com/article.ns?id=mg19225745.500 > [5] http://www.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/Portal > [6] http://www.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/Mygrid/WorkflowRepository > [7] http://iic.harvard.edu/event12.php > > _______________________________________________ > Oww-admin mailing list > Oww-admin at mit.edu > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-admin > -- John Cumbers, Graduate Student in Computational Biology Brown University, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Box G-W 80 Waterman Street, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA Tel USA: +1 401 523 8190, Fax: +1 401 863-2166 UK to USA: 0207 617 7824 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070127/a3560488/attachment.htm From austin at csail.mit.edu Sat Jan 27 15:06:29 2007 From: austin at csail.mit.edu (Austin Che) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:06:29 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] flexible databases Message-ID: <877iv8jku2.fsf@nitsua.mit.edu> I've been looking at using Exhibit on the wiki: http://simile.mit.edu/wiki/Exhibit It allows for completely client side databases with javascript. I've been talking with the author to improve the support for it on the wiki. There are still some bugs but I've gotten it to work with firefox at least in some configuration. As one test, I've moved some of the E. coli genotypes here: http://openwetware.org/index.php?title=E._coli_genotypes/Exhibit You can edit the data as javascript in the file. There are lots of display options. Right now it just uses the default display options. Some key things that I think are interesting and have tested: - The data can be read from a Google spreadsheet instead of from the wiki. - Support for google maps (although this does not quite yet work on the wiki) - Timeline support. This supposedly already works on the wiki http://ontoworld.org/wiki/Upcoming_events -- Austin Che (617)253-5899 From endy at MIT.EDU Sat Jan 27 16:51:41 2007 From: endy at MIT.EDU (endy@MIT.EDU) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:51:41 +0000 Subject: [OWW-SC] =?windows-1252?q?The_Other_Here_=BB_Blog_Archive_=BB_Rem?= =?windows-1252?q?ember_the_Name_Me=2Edium?= Message-ID: <1419043128-1169934901-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-743255771-@bxe011-cell02.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> http://blogs.electricsheepcompany.com/jerry/?p=430 Also, I just had a good talk w/ Mike Eisen and will debrief once I get back to a laptop. Drew Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless From austin at csail.mit.edu Sun Jan 28 12:19:10 2007 From: austin at csail.mit.edu (Austin Che) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:19:10 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] YouTubers get ad money share Message-ID: <87sldvhxwx.fsf@nitsua.mit.edu> A revenue model for YouTube that could be applied to OWW: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6305957.stm -- Austin Che (617)253-5899 From tk at csail.mit.edu Sun Jan 28 19:58:13 2007 From: tk at csail.mit.edu (Tom Knight) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:58:13 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] YouTubers get ad money share In-Reply-To: <87sldvhxwx.fsf@nitsua.mit.edu> References: <87sldvhxwx.fsf@nitsua.mit.edu> Message-ID: I'm a little unclear on how this would work. Does each part have a viral advertisement which you have to express (only for the first 3 cell divisions)? On Jan 28, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Austin Che wrote: > > A revenue model for YouTube that could be applied to OWW: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6305957.stm > > -- > Austin Che (617)253-5899 > _______________________________________________ > OpenWetWare Steering Committee Mailing List > sc at openwetware.org > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-sc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6620 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070128/9aba2e4a/attachment.bin From jasonk at MIT.EDU Tue Jan 30 01:11:12 2007 From: jasonk at MIT.EDU (Jason Kelly) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:11:12 -0500 Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_[OWW-SC]_The_Other_Here_=BB_Blog_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Archive_=BB_Remember_the_Name_Me.dium?= In-Reply-To: <1419043128-1169934901-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-743255771-@bxe011-cell02.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <1419043128-1169934901-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-743255771-@bxe011-cell02.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Message-ID: <7c085c480701292211g5b10990ai7656e19dee5d96d6@mail.gmail.com> If you want to actually play around with Me.dium - this link should let you sign up: http://me.dium.com/from/208dd5c7 (it's an invite-based beta at the moment) pretty cool idea though. jason On 1/27/07, endy at mit.edu wrote: > > http://blogs.electricsheepcompany.com/jerry/?p=430 > > Also, I just had a good talk w/ Mike Eisen and will debrief once I get > back to a laptop. > > Drew > > Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless > _______________________________________________ > OpenWetWare Steering Committee Mailing List > sc at openwetware.org > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-sc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070130/c6fd98cd/attachment.htm From macowell at gmail.com Tue Jan 30 14:47:59 2007 From: macowell at gmail.com (Mackenzie Cowell) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:47:59 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] microformats Message-ID: <54746a3f0701301147g76395153v1110709ad2687a40@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, I'm currently the developer of the iGEM 2007 community website, and this message is aimed primarily at OWW developers. In know there has been discussion in the past about combining or merging the iGEM page and wiki with OWW, and this email is not about that. It is about how information is organized on the wiki, specifically, how the same information is presented by different labs or teams. As far as I understand it, besides using templates and categories, there is no way to really structure the content on a mediawiki page. For example, every team on the iGEM 2006 wiki provided a picture and a project abstract somewhere. The information was available, but not accessible without visiting every single team's page and actively looking for it. This year, one of our goals for the iGEM 2007 website & wiki is to make sure this kind of information is tagged, or marked-up, or annotated, or put in a special area on a template, or by some other method standardized across all the teams. If information common to all teams is standardized, it will be much easier to find and reuse, from both a human and machine perspective. I haven't learned much about it yet, but I want to point out microformatsto OWW developers. If you already know about them, please let me know what you think. Here's popular definition from the microformats website: "simple conventions for embedding semantics in HTML to enable decentralized development." They are basically just standardized xhtml tags, and so should be easy to integrate with mediawiki content. The biggest hurdle would be making them simple for users to use. I think microformats might help standardize wiki content, so I wanted to make sure they were on your radar and also invite any comments or suggestions for other means of structuring or standardizing that content. Thanks, Mac Cowell ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mackenzie Cowell Date: Jan 30, 2007 1:44 PM Subject: Re: [OWW-SC] flexible databases To: Tom Knight Cool! I wonder if there could be some sort of hybrid solution for BIG databases where the user could access a web service that would send a small facet of the big server database to their browser for viewing with Exhibit. Austin just walked by and mentioned they are trying to get the google maps integration working so all the labs can be plotted on a map; I was going to do the same thing for all the iGEM teams this year, and I wonder if Exhibit will make it easier to do. mac On 1/29/07, Tom Knight wrote: > > This doesn't work in my copy of Safari; use Firefox. > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Austin Che > > Date: January 27, 2007 3:06:29 PM EST > > To: sc at openwetware.org > > Subject: [OWW-SC] flexible databases > > > > > > I've been looking at using Exhibit on the wiki: > > http://simile.mit.edu/wiki/Exhibit > > > > It allows for completely client side databases with javascript. > > > > I've been talking with the author to improve the support for it on > > the wiki. There are still some bugs but I've gotten it to work > > with firefox at least in some configuration. > > > > As one test, I've moved some of the E. coli genotypes here: > > http://openwetware.org/index.php?title=E._coli_genotypes/Exhibit > > > > You can edit the data as javascript in the file. There are lots of > > display options. Right now it just uses the default display > > options. > > > > Some key things that I think are interesting and have tested: > > - The data can be read from a Google spreadsheet instead of from > > the wiki. > > - Support for google maps (although this does not quite yet work > > on the wiki) > > - Timeline support. This supposedly already works on the wiki > > http://ontoworld.org/wiki/Upcoming_events > > > > -- > > Austin Che (617)253-5899 > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenWetWare Steering Committee Mailing List > > sc at openwetware.org > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-sc > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070130/d335b918/attachment.htm From skosuri at MIT.EDU Wed Jan 31 20:16:00 2007 From: skosuri at MIT.EDU (Sri Kosuri) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:16:00 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] WYSIWYG editor for Firefox Message-ID: <2b0cb7a10701311716h1bab5900hd3c25aedde3553ed@mail.gmail.com> The following page describes a browser plugin for Firefox that makes wikicode more WYSIWYG. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cacycle/wikEd It's a super simple installation process and probably would be pretty decent for beginners. Installation instructions can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cacycle/wikEd#Complete_version I wonder if we could make this a default option for new users. It definitely makes it easier for novices to edit. Sri -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070131/f5c9d285/attachment.htm From johncumbers at gmail.com Wed Jan 31 21:13:27 2007 From: johncumbers at gmail.com (John Cumbers) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:13:27 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] [OWW-Discuss] WYSIWYG editor for Firefox In-Reply-To: <2b0cb7a10701311716h1bab5900hd3c25aedde3553ed@mail.gmail.com> References: <2b0cb7a10701311716h1bab5900hd3c25aedde3553ed@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I'm not actually sure that it makes it easier though, I suppose that large list of buttons looks more like MS Word which most people are used to, to me I found it a bit daunting.. I've just started using http://www.wikispaces.com/ for organising a co-op that I'm in, this has a simple but good WYSIWYG editor in it and editing is much nicer than wikimedia, mainly cause you don't have to keep re-saving all the time. Perhaps we could try the extension out on new users and see what they think, or old users who have had trouble editing... cheers, John On 1/31/07, Sri Kosuri wrote: > > The following page describes a browser plugin for Firefox that makes > wikicode more WYSIWYG. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cacycle/wikEd > > It's a super simple installation process and probably would be pretty > decent for beginners. Installation instructions can be found here: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cacycle/wikEd#Complete_version > > I wonder if we could make this a default option for new users. It > definitely makes it easier for novices to edit. > > Sri > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenWetWare Discussion Mailing List > discuss at openwetware.org > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-discuss > > > -- John Cumbers, Graduate Student in Computational Biology Brown University, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Box G-W 80 Waterman Street, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA Tel USA: +1 401 523 8190, Fax: +1 401 863-2166 UK to USA: 0207 617 7824 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070131/486449a2/attachment.htm From vincent.rouilly at gmail.com Wed Jan 31 13:58:23 2007 From: vincent.rouilly at gmail.com (Vincent Rouilly) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:58:23 +0000 Subject: [OWW-SC] Scholarpedia: a free peer reviewed encyclopedia. Message-ID: <4E7CBA7A-DE3C-45CC-86B9-443C9E175CC7@gmail.com> Hi all, just found on the web a free peer reviewed encyclopedia, might be interesting to have a look at it. www.scholarpedia.org Features: > runs under MediaWiki, created Feb 2006 > define : + Authorship policy (invited or elected by public) + Curatorship + Scholar index best, Vincent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- Welcome to Scholarpedia, the free peer reviewed encyclopedia written by scholars from all around the world. Scholarpedia feels and looks like Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Indeed, both are powered by the same program - MediaWiki. Both allow visitors to review and modify articles simply by clicking on the edit this article link. However, Scholarpedia differs from Wikipedia in some very important ways: Each article is written by an expert (invited or elected by the public). Each article is anonymously peer reviewed to ensure accurate and reliable information. Each article has a curator - typically its author -- who is responsible for its content. Any modification of the article needs to be approved by the curator before it appears in the final, approved version. Herein also lies the greatest differences between Scholarpedia and traditional print media: while the initial authorship and review processes are similar to a print journal, articles in Scholarpedia are not frozen and outdated, but dynamic, subject to an ongoing process of improvement moderated by their curators. This allows Scholarpedia to be up-to-date, yet maintain the highest quality of content. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070131/3affa9e5/attachment.htm From koeris at bu.edu Wed Jan 31 22:54:41 2007 From: koeris at bu.edu (Koeris, Michael, Sandor) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:54:41 -0500 Subject: [OWW-SC] Scholarpedia: a free peer reviewed encyclopedia. Message-ID: <38ACE5B2FDD7B14E913A09CA4685E88802D6FD09@ENG-EXCHANGE1.ad.bu.edu> Hi all, It is a great reference for those topics that are covered, however since the premise is that the experts/originators are composing the articles themselves, not all topics are nor can be covered. An example is the Hodgkin-Huxley equation page (http://scholarpedia.org/article/Hodgkin-Huxley_Model) for which Sir Andrew has been invited to be the author... That seems to me to be the rate limiting step. I do not want to sound negative - I have used the site myself and found it useful. Cheers Mike ________________________________ From: oww-sc-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:oww-sc-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Vincent Rouilly Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:58 PM To: sc at openwetware.org Subject: [OWW-SC] Scholarpedia: a free peer reviewed encyclopedia. Hi all, just found on the web a free peer reviewed encyclopedia, might be interesting to have a look at it. www.scholarpedia.org Features: > runs under MediaWiki, created Feb 2006 > define : + Authorship policy (invited or elected by public) + Curatorship + Scholar index best, Vincent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- Welcome to Scholarpedia, the free peer reviewed encyclopedia written by scholars from all around the world. Scholarpedia feels and looks like Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Indeed, both are powered by the same program - MediaWiki . Both allow visitors to review and modify articles simply by clicking on the edit this article link. However, Scholarpedia differs from Wikipedia in some very important ways: * Each article is written by an expert (invited or elected by the public). * Each article is anonymously peer reviewed to ensure accurate and reliable information. * Each article has a curator - typically its author -- who is responsible for its content. * Any modification of the article needs to be approved by the curator before it appears in the final, approved version. Herein also lies the greatest differences between Scholarpedia and traditional print media: while the initial authorship and review processes are similar to a print journal, articles in Scholarpedia are not frozen and outdated, but dynamic, subject to an ongoing process of improvement moderated by their curators. This allows Scholarpedia to be up-to-date, yet maintain the highest quality of content. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/oww-sc/attachments/20070131/01218106/attachment.htm