Destructive progress. It works for me...<br><br>B.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Mackenzie Cowell <<a href="mailto:macowell@gmail.com">macowell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I second this idea. <div><br></div><div>I was completely clueless about the discuss list until this afternoon, when austin made incidental comment about an email he had sent to it. I don't think there is a good practical reason to keep them separated at this point. We can always reestablish an SC list if there are lots of SC-only topics that would otherwise pollute the discuss list.</div>
<div><br></div><div>mac<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Jason Kelly <<a href="mailto:jasonk@mit.edu" target="_blank">jasonk@mit.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
Hi folks,<br>
<br>
I'd like to propose a merging of the discuss@oww and sc@oww lists.<br>
Most of the emails on the SC list aren't exclusively "SC business"<br>
(whatever that means), and I think having the multiple lists prevents<br>
new OWW users who only sign up for the discuss list from finding out<br>
what's going on in the OWW community (since most of that comes up on<br>
SC list). For instance, recent emails from Dan to the discuss list<br>
saying he didn't know about SC meeting details.<br>
<br>
The SC list has 47 members. The discuss list has 65 members. There<br>
are 18 people that are on SC list but not on the discuss list, so we'd<br>
merge them into discuss. (Thanks ilya for stats)<br>
<br>
Alternatively, we can be more diligent about emailing<br>
community-related things to the discuss list, but it just seems easier<br>
to merge. If the traffic gets too bad we could always start an<br>
"announce" list or a list for a particular subtopic that had lots of<br>
traffic.<br>
<br>
What do people think?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
jason<br>
_______________________________________________<br></div></div>
OpenWetWare Discussion Mailing List<br>
<a href="mailto:discuss@openwetware.org" target="_blank">discuss@openwetware.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-discuss" target="_blank">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mac Cowell<br>iGEM Coordinator<br><a href="http://igem.org" target="_blank">igem.org</a><br>231.313.9062
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
OpenWetWare Steering Committee Mailing List<br>
<a href="mailto:sc@openwetware.org">sc@openwetware.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-sc" target="_blank">http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-sc</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>